Lim Lisa M, Galvin Sean D, Javid Mohamed, Matalanis George
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb;18(2):219-24. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt478. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
The radial artery (RA) is often selected as the next conduit of choice following the internal thoracic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting operations (CABG). Radial access coronary angiography (RA-CA) has grown in popularity among cardiologists and has been advocated as the access route of choice for coronary angiography and intervention by many groups. However, sheath insertion and instrumentation may lead to structural and functional damage to the RA, which may preclude its use as a bypass conduit. The increasing use of RA-CA may therefore have an adverse effect on the ability to use the RA as a bypass conduit at subsequent CABG. To review this, a best evidence topic in cardiothoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: 'should the radial artery be used as a bypass conduit following radial access coronary angiography'? Altogether, 167 papers were found using the reported search; 11 papers were identified that provided the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these studies were tabulated. Acute RA occlusion occurs in 2.3-30.5% of patients undergoing RA-CA. While a significant number of occluded RA's show recanalization on early follow-up, markers of endothelial function such as intima-media thickening (IMT) and flow-mediated dilatation remain impaired. RA-CA causes structural injury to the RA with evidence of histological injury (including intimal hyperplasia, periarterial tissue/fat necrosis and adventitial inflammation) along with intimal tears and medial dissections evident along the entire length of the vessel. Only one paper directly assesses patency rates of RA's used as bypass grafts following RA-CA finding a significant adverse effect on graft patency (77% patency in RA-CA, compared with 98% in the control group). We recommend avoiding the RA as a bypass conduit if it has previously been used for RA-CA. In situations where conduit options are limited, if possible, the RA should be avoided for at least 3 months following RA-CA and it may be beneficial to assess the RA's patency and flow characteristics with Doppler ultrasound preoperatively.
在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中,桡动脉(RA)常被选作继胸廓内动脉之后的下一个首选移植血管。桡动脉途径冠状动脉造影术(RA-CA)在心脏病专家中越来越受欢迎,许多团体都主张将其作为冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的首选途径。然而,鞘管插入和器械操作可能会导致桡动脉出现结构和功能损伤,这可能使其无法用作移植血管。因此,RA-CA使用的增加可能会对后续CABG时将桡动脉用作移植血管的能力产生不利影响。为对此进行综述,根据结构化方案撰写了一篇心胸外科最佳证据主题文章。所探讨的问题是:“在进行桡动脉途径冠状动脉造影术后,桡动脉是否应被用作移植血管?”通过报告的检索共找到167篇论文;确定了11篇提供了回答该临床问题最佳证据的论文。将这些研究的作者、期刊、出版日期和国家、研究的患者组、研究类型、相关结局和结果制成表格。在接受RA-CA的患者中,急性桡动脉闭塞发生率为2.3%至30.5%。虽然大量闭塞的桡动脉在早期随访时显示再通,但诸如内膜中层增厚(IMT)和血流介导的扩张等内皮功能标志物仍受损。RA-CA会对桡动脉造成结构损伤,有组织学损伤的证据(包括内膜增生、动脉周围组织/脂肪坏死和外膜炎症),同时在血管全长可见内膜撕裂和中层剥离。只有一篇论文直接评估了RA-CA后用作旁路移植血管的桡动脉的通畅率,发现对移植血管通畅率有显著不利影响(RA-CA组通畅率为77%,而对照组为98%)。我们建议,如果桡动脉先前已用于RA-CA,则避免将其用作移植血管。在移植血管选择有限的情况下,如果可能,在RA-CA后至少3个月应避免使用桡动脉,术前用多普勒超声评估桡动脉的通畅情况和血流特征可能有益。