Suppr超能文献

采用五种不同抗凝方法进行血液透析前后的血小板相关止血情况。

Platelet-related hemostasis before and after hemodialysis with five different anticoagulation methods.

作者信息

Knehtl Masa, Ponikvar Rafael, Buturovic-Ponikvar Jadranka

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Int J Artif Organs. 2013 Oct;36(10):717-24. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000239. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate platelet-related hemostasis during hemodialysis performed with five different anticoagulation methods.

METHODS

31 chronic hemodialysis patients, 71% men, aged 57.5 ± 17.4 years, participated in our prospective study. Platelet function analyzer PFA -100 closure time (collagen/epinephrine -CEPI, collagen/adenosine diphosphate -CADP) was measured before and after hemodialysis, which was performed consecutively with five different anticoagulation methods: full-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH): 31 patients, regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA): 28 patients, low-dose heparin: 25 patients and "heparin-free'' dialysis: 9 patients. The degree of clotting in the dialysis system was graded on a 5 point scale.

RESULTS: CEPI (mean ± SD, reference range 80-160 sec) before vs. after hemodialysis: UFH: 171.7 ± 62.1 vs. 170.8 ± 67.3; LMWH: 167.4 ± 56.9 vs. 159.4 ± 56.4; low-dose heparin: 175.3 ± 69.0 vs. 183.1 ± 
60.5; RCA: 172.6 ± 57.4 vs. 161.6 ± 57.0; "heparin-free'': 181.7 ± 56.8 vs. 209.0 ± 66.5; all differences nonsignificant. CADP (mean ± SD, reference range: 68-121 sec) before vs. after hemodialysis: UFH: 132.0 ± 56.6 vs.146.3 ± 68.4; LMWH: 132.4 ± 57,0 vs. 123.1 ± 50.8; low-dose heparin: 137.2 ± 64.2 vs. 143.8 ± 55.5; RCA: 140.7 ± 48.2 vs. 132.9 ± 48.1; "heparin-free'': 137.1 ± 68.0 vs.139.2 ± 29.7; all differences nonsignificant. Before hemodialysis procedure CEPI was increased in 51.2% and CADP in 48.4% of the patients. The best dialysis system clotting score was found with UFH, LMWH and RCA.

CONCLUSIONS

Platelet dysfunction was demonstrated in approximately half of the chronic hemodialysis patients and was not improved after hemodialysis, regardless of the anticoagulation regimen used.

摘要

目的

评估采用五种不同抗凝方法进行血液透析期间血小板相关的止血情况。

方法

31例慢性血液透析患者参与了我们的前瞻性研究,其中男性占71%,年龄为57.5±17.4岁。在血液透析前后,使用血小板功能分析仪PFA-100测定封闭时间(胶原/肾上腺素-CEPI、胶原/二磷酸腺苷-CADP),血液透析采用五种不同的抗凝方法依次进行:全剂量普通肝素(UFH)和低分子量肝素(LMWH):31例患者;局部枸橼酸盐抗凝(RCA):28例患者;低剂量肝素:25例患者;“无肝素”透析:9例患者。透析系统中的凝血程度按5分制进行分级。

结果

血液透析前后CEPI(均值±标准差,参考范围80 - 160秒):UFH:171.7±62.1对比170.8±67.3;LMWH:167.4±56.9对比159.4±56.4;低剂量肝素:175.3±69.0对比183.1±60.5;RCA:172.6±57.4对比161.6±57.0;“无肝素”:181.7±56.8对比209.0±66.5;所有差异均无统计学意义。血液透析前后CADP(均值±标准差,参考范围:68 - 121秒):UFH:132.0±56.6对比146.3±68.4;LMWH:132.4±57.0对比123.1±50.8;低剂量肝素:137.2±64.2对比143.8±55.5;RCA:140.7±(48.2对比132.9±48.1;“无肝素”:137.1±68.0对比139.2±29.7;所有差异均无统计学意义。在血液透析前,51.2%的患者CEPI升高,48.4%的患者CADP升高。UFH、LMWH和RCA的透析系统凝血评分最佳。

结论

约一半的慢性血液透析患者存在血小板功能障碍,且无论采用何种抗凝方案,血液透析后血小板功能障碍均未改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验