Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University, 62901, Carbondale, IL.
J Chem Ecol. 1992 Dec;18(12):2223-50. doi: 10.1007/BF00984947.
House mice (Mus musculus) living in outdoor enclosures were tested for urinary chemical cue preferences using odor-baited traps. In the first experiment, with only volatile cues available, odors from conspecific males and females of various age classes and reproductive conditions were tested; no preferences were exhibited. In the second experiment mice had both nonvolatile and volatile cues available from the same sources as in experiment I. All age and sex class and female reproductive condition groups exhibited odor cue preferences except juvenile females. There were no specific odor cue preferences exhibited by any of the responder types with regard to odors from juvenile females. In the third and fifth experiments, mice were presented with nonvolatile plus volatile or only volatile urine odor cues, respectively, from four genera,Mus, Peromyscus, Microtus, andHomo. Mice of all age classes and both sexes preferredMus musculus odor, were neutral towardMicrotus ochrogaster odor, and avoided odors fromPeromyscus leucopus andHomo sapiens; these patterns were the same regardless of whether only volatile or both volatile and nonvolatile cues were presented. The fourth and sixth experiments involved testing volatile cues only and volatile cues plus nonvolatile cues from human sweat or feces from dogs, cats, or shrews. Mice avoided the human sweat and feces from cats and shrews, but were neutral toward the odor of dog feces. There were effects on whether mice were trapped in the interior of the enclosure or on the perimeter for some odors tested in these six experiments. The findings provide insights regarding possible functions of odor cues in the behavioral ecology of house mice. Odor-baiting traps can be an effective tool with respect to testing some, but not all questions pertaining to olfactory cues and house mouse social biology.
居住在户外围栏中的家鼠(Mus musculus)通过气味诱饵陷阱测试了尿液化学线索偏好。在第一个实验中,只有挥发性线索可用,测试了来自不同年龄和生殖状态的同种雄性和雌性的气味;没有表现出偏好。在第二个实验中,老鼠既有来自同一来源的非挥发性和挥发性线索,也有来自实验 I 的线索。除了幼鼠外,所有年龄和性别类别的雌性生殖状态组都表现出对气味线索的偏好。对于来自幼鼠的气味,没有任何应答类型表现出特定的气味线索偏好。在第三个和第五个实验中,分别向老鼠呈现了来自四个属的非挥发性加挥发性或仅挥发性尿液气味线索,即 Mus、Peromyscus、Microtus 和 Homo。所有年龄和性别的老鼠都喜欢 Mus musculus 的气味,对 Microtus ochrogaster 的气味呈中性,并且避开 Peromyscus leucopus 和 Homo sapiens 的气味;无论仅呈现挥发性线索还是非挥发性和挥发性线索,这些模式都是相同的。第四个和第六个实验仅涉及测试挥发性线索,以及来自人类汗液或狗、猫或鼩鼱粪便的挥发性线索加非挥发性线索。老鼠避开了猫和鼩鼱的人汗液和粪便,但对狗粪便的气味呈中性。在这些六个实验中,对于某些测试的气味,老鼠是否被困在围栏内部或周边会产生影响。这些发现为家鼠行为生态学中气味线索的可能功能提供了一些见解。气味诱饵陷阱可以成为测试与嗅觉线索和家鼠社会生物学相关的一些问题的有效工具,但不是所有问题。