低剂量阿司匹林与原发性和继发性心血管疾病预防中的上消化道出血:一项基于人群的巢式病例对照研究

Low-dose aspirin and upper gastrointestinal bleeding in primary versus secondary cardiovascular prevention: a population-based, nested case-control study.

作者信息

Lin Kueiyu Joshua, De Caterina Raffaele, García Rodríguez Luis A

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Jan;7(1):70-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000494. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefit-risk profile of low-dose aspirin in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease is unclear. We sought to quantify upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) risk associated with low-dose aspirin in secondary versus primary prevention patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a population-based nested case-control study using The Health Improvement Network (THIN) Database between 2000 and 2007. We identified 2049 cases of UGIB and 20,000 controls, frequency-matched to the cases on age, sex, and calendar year, who were subdivided into primary (without previous cardiovascular disease) and secondary (with previous cardiovascular disease) prevention populations. We estimated the relative risk of UGIB associated with the use of low-dose aspirin by multivariate logistic regression. The UGIB risk in patients taking low-dose aspirin relative to nonusers was significantly higher in the primary (adjusted relative risk, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-2.26) than in the secondary (relative risk, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.72; P value for the difference=0.0014) prevention cohort. However, as the baseline risk of UGIB was lower in the primary than in the secondary prevention cohort, numbers needed to harm per 1 year of low-dose aspirin use were 601 and 391 for primary and secondary prevention, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The relative risk of UGIB in patients taking low-dose aspirin is higher when used for primary than for secondary cardiovascular disease prevention, but this difference is more than compensated by the lower baseline risk in the primary prevention population. Such estimates are important for an assessment of the net clinical benefit in primary prevention.

摘要

背景

低剂量阿司匹林在心血管疾病一级预防中的获益风险情况尚不清楚。我们试图量化低剂量阿司匹林在二级预防与一级预防患者中相关的上消化道出血(UGIB)风险。

方法与结果

我们利用健康改善网络(THIN)数据库在2000年至2007年间开展了一项基于人群的巢式病例对照研究。我们确定了2049例UGIB病例以及20000名对照,这些对照根据年龄、性别和日历年份与病例进行频率匹配,并被分为一级预防人群(无既往心血管疾病)和二级预防人群(有既往心血管疾病)。我们通过多因素逻辑回归估计使用低剂量阿司匹林相关的UGIB相对风险。服用低剂量阿司匹林的患者相对于未使用者的UGIB风险在一级预防人群中(校正相对风险,1.90;95%置信区间,1.59 - 2.26)显著高于二级预防人群(相对风险,1.40;95%置信区间,1.14 - 1.72;差异P值 = 0.0014)。然而,由于UGIB的基线风险在一级预防人群中低于二级预防人群,每使用1年低剂量阿司匹林导致伤害所需的人数在一级预防和二级预防中分别为601和391。

结论

服用低剂量阿司匹林的患者用于心血管疾病一级预防时UGIB的相对风险高于二级预防,但这种差异被一级预防人群较低的基线风险所弥补。此类估计对于评估一级预防中的净临床获益很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索