• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PROTECT 研究中的性别特异性急性心力衰竭表型和结局。

Sex-specific acute heart failure phenotypes and outcomes from PROTECT.

机构信息

University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2013 Dec;15(12):1374-81. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hft115.

DOI:10.1093/eurjhf/hft115
PMID:24259042
Abstract

AIMS

Differences in manifestation, treatment, and outcomes of acute heart failure between men and women have not been well studied. The objective of this analysis was to characterize differences in clinical presentation, and in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes between sexes in acute heart failure patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clinical profiles, treatment characteristics, and outcomes were compared between sexes in 2033 patients hospitalized for acute heart failure and impaired renal function. Women comprised 33% of the study population and were older, had higher body mass index, LVEF, and systolic blood pressure, and a greater prevalence of diabetes. At baseline, women showed signs and symptoms of congestion comparable with men, but more often had rales, orthopnoea, and worse renal function. Women were less intensively diuresed, as indicated by lower oral and intravenous diuretic doses used, fewer dose increases, and less total weight loss during hospitalization. Furthermore, hospitalization was slightly but significantly prolonged in women (11.04 ± 7.8 vs. 10.65 ± 8.86 days; P = 0.024). Age-adjusted 180-day mortality was lower in women (15.8% vs. 18.5%, hazard ratio 0.74; 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.93, P = 0.010), but multivariable risk-adjusted mortality was similar in both sexes, mainly attributable to lower blood urea nitrogen, higher LVEF, and higher systolic blood pressure in women compared with men.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with acute heart failure present with a clinical profile different from that of men, with more hypertension, diabetes, and depression, and a preserved LVEF. During hospitalization, they were less intensively diuresed. Nevertheless, risk-adjusted 180-day outcome was similar between sexes.

摘要

目的

男性和女性急性心力衰竭的表现、治疗和结局存在差异,但这些差异尚未得到充分研究。本分析旨在描述急性心力衰竭伴肾功能不全患者的临床特征、住院和出院后结局的性别差异。

方法和结果

在 2033 例因急性心力衰竭和肾功能受损住院的患者中,比较了性别间的临床特征、治疗特征和结局。女性占研究人群的 33%,年龄较大,体重指数、左心室射血分数和收缩压较高,糖尿病患病率较高。基线时,女性的充血体征和症状与男性相当,但啰音、端坐呼吸和肾功能更差。女性的利尿治疗强度较低,表现为口服和静脉利尿剂剂量较低、剂量增加较少,以及住院期间总体重减轻较少。此外,女性的住院时间略有但显著延长(11.04±7.8 天 vs. 10.65±8.86 天;P=0.024)。校正年龄后,女性 180 天死亡率较低(15.8% vs. 18.5%,风险比 0.74;95%置信区间 0.59-0.93,P=0.010),但多变量风险调整后死亡率在两性间相似,这主要归因于女性的血尿素氮较低、左心室射血分数较高和收缩压较高。

结论

与男性相比,患有急性心力衰竭的女性表现出不同的临床特征,高血压、糖尿病和抑郁症更为常见,左心室射血分数保持正常。在住院期间,她们的利尿治疗强度较低。然而,两性间 180 天的风险调整后结局相似。

相似文献

1
Sex-specific acute heart failure phenotypes and outcomes from PROTECT.PROTECT 研究中的性别特异性急性心力衰竭表型和结局。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2013 Dec;15(12):1374-81. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hft115.
2
Gender differences in in-hospital management and outcomes in patients with decompensated heart failure: analysis from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE).失代偿性心力衰竭患者住院治疗及预后的性别差异:来自急性失代偿性心力衰竭国家注册研究(ADHERE)的分析
J Card Fail. 2006 Mar;12(2):100-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2005.09.005.
3
Sex-specific cardiovascular structure and function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.射血分数保留的心力衰竭中的性别特异性心血管结构和功能。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 May;16(5):535-42. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.67. Epub 2014 Feb 23.
4
Clinical presentation, management, and in-hospital outcomes of patients admitted with acute decompensated heart failure with preserved systolic function: a report from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) Database.收缩功能保留的急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者的临床表现、管理及住院结局:急性失代偿性心力衰竭国家注册数据库(ADHERE)报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jan 3;47(1):76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.022. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
5
Hemoglobin level, chronic kidney disease, and the risks of death and hospitalization in adults with chronic heart failure: the Anemia in Chronic Heart Failure: Outcomes and Resource Utilization (ANCHOR) Study.血红蛋白水平、慢性肾脏病与慢性心力衰竭成人患者的死亡及住院风险:慢性心力衰竭贫血:结局与资源利用(ANCHOR)研究
Circulation. 2006 Jun 13;113(23):2713-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.577577. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
6
Sex differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure: results of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.各类心力衰竭患者临床特征及预后的性别差异:坎地沙坦治疗心力衰竭:降低死亡率和发病率评估(CHARM)项目的结果
Circulation. 2007 Jun 19;115(24):3111-20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.673442. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
7
Renal function trajectories and clinical outcomes in acute heart failure.急性心力衰竭的肾功能轨迹和临床结局。
Circ Heart Fail. 2014 Jan;7(1):59-67. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000556. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
8
In chronic heart failure with marked fluid retention, the i.v. high doses of loop diuretic are a predictor of aggravated renal dysfunction, especially in the set of heart failure with normal or only mildly impaired left ventricular systolic function.在伴有明显液体潴留的慢性心力衰竭中,静脉注射大剂量袢利尿剂是肾功能恶化的一个预测指标,尤其是在左心室收缩功能正常或仅轻度受损的心力衰竭患者中。
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2011 Dec;59(6):543-54. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
9
Sex differences in in-hospital mortality in acute decompensated heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction.射血分数降低和射血分数保留的急性失代偿性心力衰竭住院患者的性别差异。
Am Heart J. 2012 Mar;163(3):430-7, 437.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.12.013.
10
Comparison of morbidity in women versus men with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.射血分数保留的心力衰竭女性与男性的发病率比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Apr 15;97(8):1228-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.11.042. Epub 2006 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Women's Cardiovascular Disease Care.人工智能对女性心血管疾病护理的影响。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Jun 20;27(1):98. doi: 10.1007/s11886-025-02250-7.
2
Gender differences in efficiency of the telemedicine care of heart failure patients. The results from the TeleEduCare-HF study.心力衰竭患者远程医疗护理效率的性别差异。TeleEduCare-HF研究的结果。
Arch Med Sci. 2024 Dec 31;20(6):1797-1808. doi: 10.5114/aoms/183523. eCollection 2024.
3
Sex differences in the diagnostic algorithm of screening for heart failure by symptoms and NT-proBNP in patients with type 2 diabetes.
2 型糖尿病患者应用症状和 NT-proBNP 筛查心力衰竭的诊断算法中的性别差异。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Aug 1;23(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02360-6.
4
Sex-Related Differences in Patient Characteristics, Hemodynamics, and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock: INOVA-SHOCK Registry.心源性休克患者特征、血流动力学及预后的性别差异:INOVA休克注册研究
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Sep-Oct;2(5). doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100978. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
5
Sex Differences in Acute Heart Failure Management: Is There a Gap in Treatment Quality?急性心力衰竭管理中的性别差异:治疗质量是否存在差距?
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2023 Apr;20(2):121-128. doi: 10.1007/s11897-023-00593-2. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
6
Sex related differences in the characteristics and outcomes of heart failure: A sub analysis of heart failure disease management study.心力衰竭特征及预后的性别差异:心力衰竭疾病管理研究的一项亚组分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 1;9:1012361. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1012361. eCollection 2022.
7
Sex Differences in the Evaluation of Congestion Markers in Patients with Acute Heart Failure.急性心力衰竭患者充血标志物评估中的性别差异
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Feb 24;9(3):67. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9030067.
8
Moving the Paradigm Forward for Prediction and Risk-Based Primary Prevention of Heart Failure in Special Populations.推动特殊人群心力衰竭预测及基于风险的一级预防模式的发展。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2022 May;24(5):343-356. doi: 10.1007/s11883-022-01009-7. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
9
Blood pressure categorization and subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in antihypertensive medication-naive subjects.抗高血压药物治疗初治患者的血压分类与亚临床左心室功能障碍。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Jun;9(3):1766-1774. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13860. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
10
Sex differences in congestive markers in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure.因急性心力衰竭住院患者充血标志物的性别差异。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Jun;8(3):1784-1795. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13300. Epub 2021 Mar 11.