Gosselin Robert C, Dwyre Denis M, Dager William E
University of California-Davis Health System, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Dec;47(12):1635-40. doi: 10.1177/1060028013509074. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
Clinicians managing patients receiving the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran may benefit in being able to determine the amount of drug present in selected situations. This may include assessment of accumulation, concurrent drug interactions, or adequate removal from circulation. The ability to estimate the amount of dabigatran present using the chromogenic ecarin assay (ECA) requires further clarification.
To describe the reliability of dabigatran measurements using a chromogenic ECA.
This was an evaluation of the ECA method that incorporated assessment of imprecision, linearity, accuracy, carryover, and lower limits of detection or blank. Pooled normal plasma enriched with dabigatran at concentrations of 0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 200, 300, 400, and 500 ng/mL were sent blinded to 3 laboratories in the United States to compare our ECA results with those of laboratories reporting dilute thrombin time methods (HEMOCLOT thrombin inhibitor assay) for measuring dabigatran. Trough and peak levels from 35 patients were also compared with mass spectrophotometry for assessing ECA accuracy.
The within-run or day-to-day imprecision was less than 10%, with high linearity (R (2) = 0.989) and high degree of accuracy (R (2) = 0.985; slope = 0.908) for levels ranging between 18 and 470 ng/mL and no carryover at 0 ng/mL noted. The ECA approach appeared to be more reliable at lower dabigatran concentrations.
The chromogenic ECA appears to be an effective approach to determine the amount of dabigatran present. Further insights are necessary to determine how it can be used to reduce thromboembolic or bleeding complications in patients receiving dabigatran.
管理接受直接凝血酶抑制剂达比加群治疗患者的临床医生若能在特定情况下确定药物含量,可能会有所助益。这可能包括评估药物蓄积、并发药物相互作用或药物从循环中充分清除的情况。使用发色底物法(ECA)估计达比加群含量的能力需要进一步明确。
描述使用发色底物法(ECA)测量达比加群的可靠性。
这是对ECA方法的评估,包括评估不精密度、线性、准确性、残留以及检测下限或空白。将添加了浓度为0、25、50、75、100、125、150、200、300、400和500 ng/mL达比加群的混合正常血浆,在不知情的情况下分别送至美国的3家实验室,以将我们的ECA结果与报告采用稀释凝血酶时间法(HEMOCLOT凝血酶抑制剂测定法)测量达比加群的实验室结果进行比较。还将35例患者的谷值和峰值水平与质谱法进行比较以评估ECA准确性。
批内或日间不精密度小于10%,对于18至470 ng/mL的水平具有高线性(R² = 0.989)和高准确度(R² = 0.985;斜率 = 0.908),且在0 ng/mL时未发现残留。在较低达比加群浓度下,ECA方法似乎更可靠。
发色底物法(ECA)似乎是确定达比加群含量的有效方法。需要进一步深入了解如何将其用于减少接受达比加群治疗患者的血栓栓塞或出血并发症。