Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Dec;15(12):2377-2387. doi: 10.1111/jth.13857. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
Essentials Routine monitoring is unnecessary but measuring dabigatran levels is helpful in certain situations. We compared ecarin chromogenic assay (STA-ECA-II) and dilute thrombin time (dTT) in patient samples. Both tests provided accurate measurements over a wide range of dabigatran concentrations. Adoption of STA-ECA-II and dTT into routine clinical practice will improve patient care.
Background Although routine coagulation monitoring is unnecessary, measuring plasma dabigatran concentrations can be useful for detecting drug accumulation in renal failure or overdose, assessing the contribution of dabigatran to serious bleeding, planning the timing of urgent surgery or intervention, or determining the suitability for thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Dabigatran concentrations can be quantified using chromogenic or clot-based tests, such as the ecarin chromogenic assay (ECA) and the diluted thrombin time (dTT), respectively. Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the results of these assays with dabigatran concentrations measured by the reference standard of mass spectrometry in samples from 50 dabigatran-treated patients collected at peak and trough after at least 4 months of drug intake. Methods Drug levels measured with either the STA Ecarin Chromogenic Assay-II (STA-ECA-II) or dTT were linearly correlated with those determined by mass spectrometry over a wide range of concentrations. Results and Conclusions For detection of levels below 50 ng mL both tests have specificities of at least 96%, suggesting that they accurately detect even low levels of drug. Therefore, regardless of whether a chromogenic or clot-based platform is preferred, the STA-ECA-II and dTT are useful tests for measuring dabigatran concentrations. Unfortunately, neither test is licensed by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Although approved in other jurisdictions, the dTT and STA-ECA-II are not widely or rapidly available in most hospitals. Therefore, cooperation between regulators and hospitals is urgently needed to render these tests readily available to inform patient care.
常规监测是不必要的,但在某些情况下测量达比加群水平是有帮助的。我们比较了蝰蛇凝血酶时间(eCarin chromogenic assay,STA-ECA-II)和稀释凝血酶时间(dTT)在患者样本中的应用。两种检测方法在广泛的达比加群浓度范围内都能提供准确的测量结果。将 STA-ECA-II 和 dTT 纳入常规临床实践将改善患者的治疗效果。
虽然常规凝血监测是不必要的,但测量血浆达比加群浓度可以有助于检测肾衰竭或过量时药物蓄积、评估达比加群对严重出血的影响、计划紧急手术或介入的时机,或确定急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓治疗的适宜性。可以使用显色或基于凝血的检测方法来定量达比加群浓度,如蝰蛇显色检测法(ECA)和稀释凝血酶时间(dTT)。
本研究旨在比较这两种检测方法与 50 例达比加群治疗患者在至少 4 个月药物摄入后达到峰值和谷值时采集的样本中通过质谱参考标准测量的达比加群浓度的结果。
用 STA Ecarin Chromogenic Assay-II(STA-ECA-II)或 dTT 测量的药物水平与质谱法在广泛的浓度范围内线性相关。
对于低于 50ng/mL 的水平,两种检测方法的特异性均至少为 96%,表明它们能够准确检测到即使是低水平的药物。因此,无论首选显色或基于凝血的平台,STA-ECA-II 和 dTT 都是测量达比加群浓度的有用检测方法。不幸的是,这两种检测方法均未获得美国食品药品监督管理局的批准。尽管在其他司法管辖区获得批准,但 dTT 和 STA-ECA-II 在大多数医院并不广泛或快速应用。因此,监管机构和医院之间急需合作,以使这些检测方法能够快速投入使用,为患者治疗提供信息。