Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房谵妄的药物治疗:系统评价。

The pharmacologic treatment of intensive care unit delirium: a systematic review.

机构信息

University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Sep;47(9):1168-74. doi: 10.1177/1060028013500466.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the treatment of ICU delirium.

DATA SOURCES

Literature searches were conducted using PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE (January 1980 to March 2013). Clinical trials/reports evaluating the use of pharmacologic treatment for ICU delirium were selected. References from major guidelines and publications were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

English-language articles related to the treatment of ICU delirium were included. The following were excluded: (1) used pharmacologic treatment for the prevention of delirium; (2) inclusion of non-critically ill, palliative care, or hospice care patients; (3) letters to the editor; (4) case studies; (5) case series; (6) studies without delirium-related end points; and (7) studies with a predominantly postoperative population. Data extracted included: study design, population, treatment, number of participants, end points, outcomes/authors' conclusions, and adverse effects.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Four studies were included in this review. The US Preventative Services Task Force classification scheme was used to assess the quality of evidence. All 4 studies reviewed were level I evidence studies. There are few well-designed, randomized studies that evaluate ICU delirium treatment. The 2 main randomized studies have small sample sizes and methodological concerns. Antipsychotic therapy may reduce the duration of ICU delirium. However, more robust studies are needed to demonstrate benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of evidence supporting pharmacologic treatment for ICU delirium. Prospective, well-designed studies using proper delirium identification tools and severity are necessary to confirm the overall impact of pharmacologic therapy on the duration of delirium and associated complications.

摘要

目的

系统评估 ICU 谵妄的治疗方法。

资料来源

通过 PubMed 和 Ovid MEDLINE(1980 年 1 月至 2013 年 3 月)进行文献检索。选择评估 ICU 谵妄使用药物治疗的临床试验/报告。综述了主要指南和出版物的参考文献。

研究选择和数据提取

纳入了与 ICU 谵妄治疗相关的英文文章。排除以下内容:(1)使用药物治疗预防谵妄;(2)纳入非危重症、姑息治疗或临终关怀患者;(3)致编辑的信;(4)病例研究;(5)病例系列;(6)无谵妄相关终点的研究;(7)主要为术后人群的研究。提取的数据包括:研究设计、人群、治疗、参与者人数、终点、结果/作者结论和不良反应。

数据综合

本综述纳入了 4 项研究。使用美国预防服务工作组分类方案评估证据质量。所有 4 项研究均为 I 级证据研究。几乎没有设计良好、随机评估 ICU 谵妄治疗的研究。2 项主要的随机研究样本量小且存在方法学问题。抗精神病药物治疗可能会缩短 ICU 谵妄的持续时间。但是,需要更有力的研究来证明其获益。

结论

目前缺乏支持 ICU 谵妄药物治疗的证据。需要前瞻性、设计良好的研究,使用适当的谵妄识别工具和严重程度来证实药物治疗对谵妄持续时间和相关并发症的总体影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验