University of Wolverhampton , UK.
J Sports Sci Med. 2006 Jun 1;5(2):243-53. eCollection 2006.
Evidence points to the existence of a home advantage effect in soccer with referees giving more decisions to the home team being a plausible explanation for this effect. The purpose of the present study was to use qualitative methods to explore the factors that influence experienced referees when making decisions. Five experienced referees volunteered to participate in semi-structured interviews of 30-40 minutes duration. Examples of questions/probes included 'Are there times when it is difficult to make a decision on whether there was a foul or not? When? Why?' and 'Do you worry about making the wrong / unpopular decision? What affect does this have on you?' Content analysis identified 13 inter-related themes that describe four higher-order themes. The themes 'accuracy-error', 'regulations', and 'professionalism' form a higher-order theme labeled 'ideal-decision making'. The themes 'opinion', 'concentration', and 'control' represent a higher- order theme labeled 'individual factors'; 'experience', 'personality', and 'personal life' represent a higher-order factor labeled 'experience factors', and crowd factors, player reaction, environmental factors, and crowd interaction represent a higher-order factor labeled 'situational factors'. Findings from the present study offer some insight into difficulties and coping strategies used by referees to perform consistently in professional soccer. Future research could use quantitative methods to test the relative contribution of themes identified above to the decision-making process in referees. At an applied level, practitioners should develop strategies that accelerate the process of learning to cope with performance-related stressors such as the crowd noise. Key PointsFive experienced described factors associated with decision making in soccer leading to the identification of 13 inter-related themes that describe four higher-order themes.Higher order themes include ideal-decision making', 'individual factors', 'experience factors', and 'situational factors'.Findings from the present study offer some insight into difficulties and coping strategies used by referees to perform consistently in professional soccer.Practitioners should develop strategies that accelerate the process of learning to cope with performance-related stressors.
证据表明,足球比赛中存在主场优势效应,裁判更倾向于判罚主场球队,这是造成这种效应的一个合理解释。本研究的目的是使用定性方法来探讨影响经验丰富裁判做出决策的因素。五位经验丰富的裁判自愿参加了时长 30-40 分钟的半结构化访谈。问题示例包括:“是否有难以决定是否有犯规的情况?何时?为什么?”和“你是否担心做出错误/不受欢迎的决定?这对你有什么影响?”内容分析确定了 13 个相互关联的主题,这些主题描述了四个更高层次的主题。主题“准确性-错误”、“规则”和“专业精神”形成了一个更高层次的主题,称为“理想决策”。主题“意见”、“专注”和“控制”代表了一个更高层次的主题,称为“个人因素”;“经验”、“个性”和“个人生活”代表了一个更高层次的因素,称为“经验因素”,而人群因素、球员反应、环境因素和人群互动代表了一个更高层次的因素,称为“情境因素”。本研究的结果提供了一些关于裁判在职业足球比赛中保持一致表现时所面临的困难和应对策略的见解。未来的研究可以使用定量方法来测试上述主题对裁判决策过程的相对贡献。在应用层面上,从业者应该制定策略,加速学习应对与表现相关的压力源的过程,例如人群噪音。