Due to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Feb;9(2):271-8. doi: 10.2215/CJN.13071212. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
An open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II trial was conducted from July 1, 2005 to March 29, 2011 to compare two protocols for treating children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome using microemulsified cyclosporine.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Ninety-three children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome were randomly assigned to group A (n=46) or group B (n=47). In both groups, the 2-hour postdose cyclosporine level was monitored. For group A, the cyclosporine target was set to 600-700 ng/ml for the first 6 months and 450-550 ng/ml for the next 18 months; for group B, it was set to 450-550 ng/ml for the first 6 months and 300-400 ng/ml for the next 18 months. The primary end point was the sustained remission rate. At the end of the study, if there was no difference in safety profile between the two groups and the sustained remission rate in group A was superior to group B with a decision threshold of 8%, then the regimen for group A would be determined the better treatment.
Eight children from an ineligible institution, where cyclosporine levels were not measured, were excluded from all analyses. At 24 months, the sustained remission rate was nonsignificantly higher in group A (n=43) than group B (n=42; 64.4% versus 50.0%; hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.29 to 1.11; P=0.09), and the progression-free survival rate was significantly higher (88.1% versus 68.4%; hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 0.94; P=0.03). The relapse rate was significantly lower in group A than group B (0.41 versus 0.95 times/person-year; hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.19 to 0.84; P=0.02). The rate and severity of adverse events were similar in both treatment groups.
The sustained remission rate was not significantly different between the two treatment groups, but the regimen with the higher 2-hour postdose cyclosporine level target improved progression-free survival and reduced the relapse rate.
一项开放标签、多中心、随机二期临床试验于 2005 年 7 月 1 日至 2011 年 3 月 29 日进行,旨在比较两种使用微乳化环孢素治疗频繁复发肾病综合征儿童的方案。
设计、地点、参与者和测量:93 例频繁复发肾病综合征患儿随机分为 A 组(n=46)或 B 组(n=47)。两组均监测环孢素 2 小时后剂量水平。对于 A 组,环孢素目标设定为前 6 个月 600-700ng/ml,后 18 个月 450-550ng/ml;对于 B 组,前 6 个月设定为 450-550ng/ml,后 18 个月设定为 300-400ng/ml。主要终点是持续缓解率。研究结束时,如果两组在安全性方面没有差异,且 A 组的持续缓解率优于 B 组,且决策阈值为 8%,则确定 A 组的方案为更好的治疗方案。
由于环孢素水平未测量,8 名来自不合规机构的患儿被排除在所有分析之外。24 个月时,A 组(n=43)持续缓解率高于 B 组(n=42),但差异无统计学意义(64.4%比 50.0%;风险比,0.57;95%置信区间,0.29 至 1.11;P=0.09),无进展生存率显著升高(88.1%比 68.4%;风险比,0.33;95%置信区间,0.12 至 0.94;P=0.03)。A 组复发率显著低于 B 组(0.41 比 0.95 次/人年;风险比,0.43;95%置信区间,0.19 至 0.84;P=0.02)。两组治疗组的不良事件发生率和严重程度相似。
两组治疗方案的持续缓解率无显著差异,但较高 2 小时后剂量环孢素水平目标的方案改善了无进展生存率,降低了复发率。