Yoda Shunichi, Nakanishi Kanae, Tano Ayako, Hori Yusuke, Suzuki Yasuyuki, Matsumoto Naoya, Hirayama Atsushi
Department of Cardiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
J Cardiol. 2014 May;63(5):350-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
Automated quantitative assessment based on a total perfusion deficit (TPD) has been recognized to be useful for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). We, therefore, aimed to validate reproducibility of the automated quantification with the TPD on myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images in Japanese patients with history of stable CAD.
Patients (n=47, age 67 ± 10) underwent rest (201)Tl and stress (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion SPECT on two separate occasions with the same protocol within 3-26 months. They had abnormal findings on the first SPECT imaging by visual analysis and had no changes in symptoms, cardiac medications, coronary risk factors, and electrocardiogram findings at the time of the second imaging. They had no intervening coronary revascularization and myocardial infarction between the first and second imaging. The TPD was automatically derived from SPECT images through quantitative perfusion SPECT software with the Japanese normal database. A visual summed stress score (SSS) was estimated with the 5-point visual scoring model for 20 segments of SPECT images by independent expert interpreters. Abnormal criteria for the stress TPD and SSS were defined as ≥5% and ≥4, respectively.
The stress TPD determined by the quantitative analysis well correlated between the first and second imaging (r=0.985) as well as the SSS by the visual analysis showed good correlation (r=0.978). The correlation coefficients were similar between the visual and quantitative analyses. Bland-Altman analyses indicated extremely good reproducibility in both assessments.
The TPD is evidently a quantitative index having high reproducibility and the automated quantification with it provides comparable results to the visual assessment by experienced interpreters. The automated quantification with the TPD is highly significant for clinical assessment of CAD, and allows easily performing myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging without expert interpreters.
基于总灌注缺损(TPD)的自动定量评估已被认为对检测冠状动脉疾病(CAD)有用。因此,我们旨在验证在有稳定CAD病史的日本患者中,利用TPD对心肌灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)图像进行自动定量的可重复性。
47例患者(年龄67±10岁)在3至26个月内按照相同方案分两次进行静息(201)铊和负荷(99m)锝-替曲膦心肌灌注SPECT检查。他们在首次SPECT成像时经视觉分析有异常发现,且在第二次成像时症状、心脏用药、冠状动脉危险因素和心电图表现均无变化。在第一次和第二次成像之间他们未进行介入性冠状动脉血运重建和心肌梗死。通过带有日本正常数据库的定量灌注SPECT软件从SPECT图像中自动得出TPD。由独立的专家解读员使用5分视觉评分模型对SPECT图像的20个节段进行视觉总负荷评分(SSS)评估。负荷TPD和SSS的异常标准分别定义为≥5%和≥4。
定量分析得出的负荷TPD在第一次和第二次成像之间相关性良好(r=0.985),视觉分析得出的SSS也显示出良好的相关性(r=0.978)。视觉分析和定量分析之间的相关系数相似。Bland-Altman分析表明两种评估的可重复性都非常好。
TPD显然是一个具有高可重复性的定量指标,利用它进行自动定量得出的结果与经验丰富的解读员的视觉评估结果相当。利用TPD进行自动定量对CAD的临床评估具有重要意义,并且无需专家解读员即可轻松进行心肌灌注SPECT成像。