• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用轻质Y型补片进行机器人骶骨阴道固定术后1年的主观和客观结果

Subjective and objective results 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight Y-mesh.

作者信息

Culligan Patrick J, Gurshumov Emil, Lewis Christa, Priestley Jennifer L, Komar Jodie, Shah Nihar, Salamon Charbel G

机构信息

Atlantic Health System, Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, 435 South Street, Suite 370, Morristown, NJ, 07960, USA,

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jun;25(6):731-5. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2265-x. Epub 2013 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-013-2265-x
PMID:24264283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4544463/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective of this study was to assess outcomes following robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight polypropylene Y-mesh.

METHODS

During our study period, all patients who underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy were enrolled in this single-arm prospective trial. Endpoints included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) values; Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, short form 20 (PFDI-20); Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, short form 7 (PFIQ-7); Surgical Satisfaction scores; and the Sandvik Incontinence Severity Index. All surgeries were performed with a pre-configured monofilament type 1 polypropylene Y-mesh (Alyte©, C.R. Bard, Covington, GA, USA). Cure rates at 12 months were calculated using two separate definitions: (1) "clinical cure": no POP-Q points > 0, point C ≤ -5, no prolapse symptoms on the PFDI-20, and no reoperations for prolapse and (2) "objective anatomic cure": POP-Q stage 0 or 1, point C of ≤ -5, and no reoperations for prolapse.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy and 143 (95 %) were available for 12-month follow-up. Mean age was 58.6 ± 9.8 and mean body mass index was 26.3 ± 4.5. Mean operative time and blood loss were 148 ± 27.6 min (range 75-250 min) and 51.2 ± 32, respectively. There were no mesh erosions or exposures, and mesh edges were not palpable in any patient. At 12 months the clinical cure rate was 95 %, and the objective anatomic cure rate was 84 %. The PFDI-20 mean score improved from 98 at baseline to 17 at 12 months (p < 0.0001); PFIQ-7 scores improved from 59 to 6.5 (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic sacrocolpopexy using this lightweight polypropylene Y-mesh offers excellent subjective and objective results at 1 year.

摘要

引言与假设

本研究的目的是评估使用轻质聚丙烯Y形网片进行机器人骶骨阴道固定术的疗效。

方法

在我们的研究期间,所有接受机器人骶骨阴道固定术的患者均纳入了这项单臂前瞻性试验。观察指标包括盆腔器官脱垂定量(POP-Q)值;盆底困扰量表简表20(PFDI-20);盆底影响问卷简表7(PFIQ-7);手术满意度评分;以及山德维克尿失禁严重程度指数。所有手术均使用预先配置的单丝1型聚丙烯Y形网片(Alyte©,美国科维顿市C.R. Bard公司)进行。采用两种不同的定义计算12个月时的治愈率:(1)“临床治愈”:POP-Q评分无>0分,C点≤-5分,PFDI-20上无脱垂症状,且无因脱垂而再次手术;(2)“客观解剖学治愈”:POP-Q分期为0或1期,C点≤-5分,且无因脱垂而再次手术。

结果

共有150例患者接受了机器人骶骨阴道固定术,143例(95%)患者完成了12个月的随访。平均年龄为58.6±9.8岁,平均体重指数为26.3±4.5。平均手术时间和失血量分别为148±27.6分钟(范围75 - 250分钟)和51.2±32。没有出现网片侵蚀或暴露情况,且在任何患者中均未触及网片边缘。12个月时临床治愈率为95%,客观解剖学治愈率为84%。PFDI-20平均评分从基线时的98分改善至12个月时的17分(p<0.0001);PFIQ-7评分从59分改善至6.5分(p<0.0001)。

结论

使用这种轻质聚丙烯Y形网片进行机器人骶骨阴道固定术在1年时可提供优异的主观和客观疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d45/4544463/ad7bf4a84c08/192_2013_2265_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d45/4544463/6d12d5f8df92/192_2013_2265_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d45/4544463/c7c636ac7969/192_2013_2265_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d45/4544463/ad7bf4a84c08/192_2013_2265_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d45/4544463/6d12d5f8df92/192_2013_2265_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d45/4544463/c7c636ac7969/192_2013_2265_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d45/4544463/ad7bf4a84c08/192_2013_2265_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Subjective and objective results 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight Y-mesh.使用轻质Y型补片进行机器人骶骨阴道固定术后1年的主观和客观结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jun;25(6):731-5. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2265-x. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
2
Prospective study of an ultra-lightweight polypropylene Y mesh for robotic sacrocolpopexy.用于机器人骶骨阴道固定术的超轻型聚丙烯Y型网片的前瞻性研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Aug;24(8):1371-5. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-2021-7. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
3
Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.机器人经腹腔镜单部位与机器人多部位经阴道骶骨阴道固定术治疗阴道顶端脱垂的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4):358.e1-358.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.048. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
4
Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Using Lightweight Y-Mesh.使用轻质 Y 型网片的机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术的长期结果。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Mar;26(3):202-206. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000788.
5
Porcine dermis compared with polypropylene mesh for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.猪皮与聚丙烯网片在腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):143-51. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31827558dc.
6
A 3-year follow-up after anterior colporrhaphy compared with collagen-coated transvaginal mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomised controlled trial.前阴道壁膨出经前路修补术与胶原涂层阴道网片治疗的 3 年随访:一项随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2016 Jan;123(1):136-42. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13628. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
7
Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.在机器人辅助经阴道骶骨阴道固定术中,网片固定采用锚钉与缝线的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):258.e1-258.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.018. Epub 2020 May 13.
8
[Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].经腹-经阴道联合入路腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗Ⅳ度盆腔器官脱垂的中期疗效
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Mar 25;54(3):160-165. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.03.004.
9
A comparative study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and total vaginal mesh procedure using lightweight polypropylene meshes for prolapse repair.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术与全阴道网片修补术治疗脱垂的对比研究:使用轻质聚丙烯网片。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;53(4):552-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2014.07.006.
10
A prospective randomized trial comparing Restorelle® Y mesh and flat mesh for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: 24-month outcomes.一项比较 Restorelle® Y 网片和平网片在腹腔镜和机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术中应用的前瞻性随机试验:24 个月的结果。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jun;32(6):1565-1570. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04657-y. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Intrafascial Colpotomy, Edge-to-Edge Closure, and Peritoneal Graft Technique for Minimizing Mesh Erosion in Concurrent Robotic Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy.筋膜内阴道切开术、边缘对边缘缝合及腹膜移植技术在同期机器人子宫切除术和骶骨阴道固定术中减少网片侵蚀的应用
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Apr;36(4):923-927. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-06012-x. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
2
Complications of Pelvic Prolapse Surgery Using Mesh: A Systematic Review.使用网片的盆腔器官脱垂手术并发症:一项系统评价
J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 11;14(6):622. doi: 10.3390/jpm14060622.
3
Quality-of-life improvements in patients after various surgical treatments for pelvic organ prolapse.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective study of an ultra-lightweight polypropylene Y mesh for robotic sacrocolpopexy.用于机器人骶骨阴道固定术的超轻型聚丙烯Y型网片的前瞻性研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Aug;24(8):1371-5. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-2021-7. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
2
Porcine dermis compared with polypropylene mesh for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.猪皮与聚丙烯网片在腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):143-51. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31827558dc.
3
Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.
各种手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂后患者生活质量的改善。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Mar;309(3):813-820. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07140-3. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
4
Polypropylene Pelvic Mesh: What Went Wrong and What Will Be of the Future?聚丙烯盆腔网片:哪里出了问题以及未来会怎样?
Biomedicines. 2023 Mar 1;11(3):741. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11030741.
5
Comparing Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy With Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study Through the Fellows' Pelvic Research Network.比较经阴道骶骨固定术与阴道子宫骶骨悬吊带术:通过 Fellows' 盆腔研究网络的多中心回顾性队列研究。
Urogynecology (Phila). 2022 Oct 1;28(10):687-694. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001226. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
6
Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Single Center Experience in China.机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:中国单中心经验。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Jan 12;2022:6201098. doi: 10.1155/2022/6201098. eCollection 2022.
7
Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy: not only for vaginal vault suspension? An observational cohort study.机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术:不仅仅用于阴道穹窿悬吊?一项观察性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Feb;33(2):377-384. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04740-y. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
8
Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助和腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(6):449. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4347.
9
A prospective randomized trial comparing Restorelle® Y mesh and flat mesh for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: 24-month outcomes.一项比较 Restorelle® Y 网片和平网片在腹腔镜和机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术中应用的前瞻性随机试验:24 个月的结果。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jun;32(6):1565-1570. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04657-y. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
10
Pain after permanent versus delayed absorbable monofilament suture for vaginal graft attachment during minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy.在微创全子宫切除术和骶骨阴道固定术中,永久性缝线与延迟吸收的单丝缝线用于阴道移植物固定后疼痛的比较。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Oct;31(10):2035-2041. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04471-6. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
腹腔镜与机器人骶骨阴道固定术治疗阴道脱垂的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;118(5):1005-1013. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318231537c.
4
Two-year outcomes after sacrocolpopexy with and without burch to prevent stress urinary incontinence.有或无Burch手术的骶骨阴道固定术预防压力性尿失禁的两年结果
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul;112(1):49-55. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181778d2a.
5
Quality of life and surgical satisfaction after vaginal reconstructive vs obliterative surgery for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse.阴道重建术与闭塞术治疗晚期盆腔器官脱垂后的生活质量及手术满意度
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):573.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.12.036.
6
Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7).针对盆底功能障碍女性的两种特定疾病生活质量问卷的简短形式(PFDI - 20和PFIQ - 7)。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025.
7
Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review.腹骶阴道固定术:全面综述
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;104(4):805-23. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000139514.90897.07.
8
A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12).盆底器官脱垂/尿失禁性功能问卷简表(PISQ - 12)。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Aug;14(3):164-8; discussion 168. doi: 10.1007/s00192-003-1063-2. Epub 2003 Jul 25.
9
Long-term success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh.使用合成网片进行腹骶阴道固定术的长期成功率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;187(6):1473-80; discussion 1481-2. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.129160.
10
The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.女性盆腔器官脱垂和盆底功能障碍术语的标准化
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;175(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70243-0.