Sunny Meera Mary, von Mühlenen Adrian
Cognitive Science Program, IIT Gandhinagar, VGEC Campus, Chandkheda, 382424, Ahmedabad, India,
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Feb;76(2):508-18. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0587-x.
Sunny and von Mühlenen (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1050-1056, 2011) showed that an onset of motion captured attention only when the motion was jerky (refreshed at 8 or 17 Hz), but not when it was smooth (33 or 100 Hz). However, it remained unclear why the onset of jerky motion captures attention. In the present study, we systematically tested the role of different aspects of jerky motion in capturing attention. Simple flicker without motion did not capture attention in the same way as jerky motion (Exp. 1). An abrupt displacement between 0.26° and 1.05° captured attention, irrespective of whether the stimulus subsequently continued to move smoothly (Exp. 2) or whether it remained stationary (Exps. 3 and 4). A displaced stimulus that was preceded briefly at the new location by a figure-8 placeholder did not capture attention (Exp. 5). These results are explained within a masking account, according to which abrupt onsets and abrupt displacements receive a processing advantage because they escape forward masking by the preceding figure-8 placeholders.
桑尼和冯·米伦嫩(《心理onomic通报与评论》,第18卷,第1050 - 1056页,2011年)指出,只有当运动是急促的(以8赫兹或17赫兹刷新)时,运动的开始才会吸引注意力,而当运动是平滑的(33赫兹或100赫兹)时则不会。然而,尚不清楚为什么急促运动的开始会吸引注意力。在本研究中,我们系统地测试了急促运动的不同方面在吸引注意力中的作用。没有运动的简单闪烁不会像急促运动那样吸引注意力(实验1)。0.26°至1.05°之间的突然位移会吸引注意力,无论刺激随后是继续平滑移动(实验2)还是保持静止(实验3和4)。在新位置之前由数字8占位符短暂前置的位移刺激不会吸引注意力(实验5)。这些结果在一个掩蔽模型中得到了解释,根据该模型,突然的开始和突然的位移具有处理优势,因为它们能够避免被先前的数字8占位符进行前向掩蔽。