Au-Yeung Sheena K, Kaakinen Johanna K, Benson Valerie
School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Autism Res. 2014 Feb;7(1):84-93. doi: 10.1002/aur.1352. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
The present study examined how eye movements during scene viewing are modulated by adopting psychological perspectives in both adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and typically developing adults. In the current study, participants viewed house scenes with either non-perspective-taking (look for valuable items/features of the house that need fixing) or perspective-taking instructions (imagine that you are a burglar/repairman) while their eye movements were recorded. The eye movement measures revealed that for the "look for the valuable items" and burglar perspective task, the ASD group showed typical relevance effects (the preference to look at schema-relevant compared with schema-irrelevant targets) in their eye movements. However, we found subtle processing differences between the groups that were related to initial orienting to and processing of schema-relevant items for the "look for the features that need fixing" and the repairman perspective-taking task. There was an absence of a relevance effect for the ASD group for the repairman perspective and its non-perspective-taking equivalent instruction showing that the identification of items relevant to those schemas was more difficult for the ASD group. The present findings suggest that resolving ambiguity may be a defining feature of complex information processing deficits in ASD.
本研究考察了自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)成人和发育正常的成年人在采用心理视角时,场景观看过程中的眼动是如何受到调节的。在当前研究中,参与者观看房屋场景,同时记录他们的眼动,观看时分别给出非采取视角指令(寻找房屋中需要修理的有价值物品/特征)或采取视角指令(想象自己是一名窃贼/修理工)。眼动测量结果显示,对于“寻找有价值物品”和窃贼视角任务,ASD组在眼动中表现出典型的相关性效应(相比于与图式无关的目标,更倾向于注视与图式相关的目标)。然而,我们发现两组之间存在细微的加工差异,这些差异与“寻找需要修理的特征”和修理工视角任务中对与图式相关项目的初始定向和加工有关。对于修理工视角及其非采取视角的等效指令,ASD组没有出现相关性效应,这表明ASD组更难识别与那些图式相关的项目。目前的研究结果表明,解决模糊性可能是ASD中复杂信息加工缺陷的一个决定性特征。