Division of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Cardiology and Critical Care, Stollery Children's Hospital, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Division of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Cardiology and Critical Care, Stollery Children's Hospital, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb;97(2):666-71. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.09.084. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
We compared the outcomes of modified single-patch and two-patch surgical repair of complete atrioventricular septal defect (CAVSD) on left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter and on left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) coaptation.
We reviewed retrospectively postoperative 2-dimensional echocardiograms of all CAVSD patients who underwent modified single-patch or two-patch repair between 2005 and 2011. We measured the leaflet coaptation length of the LAVV in the apical four-chamber view. The LVOT was measured in the long axis view.
Fifty-one patients underwent CAVSD repair at a median age of 4 months (range, 1 to 9 months) (single-patch, n=29; two-patch, n=22). The images from 46 echocardiograms were adequate for analysis. Modified single-patch repair required significantly shorter bypass time (102.0±33.6 vs 152.9±39.5 minutes, p<0.001) and ischemic time (69.0±21.7 vs 106.9±29.7 minutes, p<0.001) than did two-patch repair. The indexed coaptation length of the septal and lateral leaflets was not different between single-patch and two-patch (3.1±2.3 vs 4.1±3.1 mm/m2, p=0.25; 2.3±2.3 vs 3.3±3.0 mm/m2, p=0.21). Indexed LVOT diameter was not different in the two groups (26.1±5.2 vs 28.5±7.1 mm/m2, p=0.22). There was no hospital or late death during the median follow-up time of 35 months (range, 1 to 69 months). Five patients underwent reoperation after single-patch repair (3 with residual ventricular septal defect [VSD] and LAVV regurgitation, 1 with residual VSD, 1 with pacemaker implantation). After the two-patch repair, 1 patient required reoperation for a residual VSD and right atrioventricular valve regurgitation (p=0.22).
The modified single-patch repair was performed with significantly shorter bypass time and myocardial ischemic time. The postoperative LVOT diameter and LAVV leaflet coaptation length were not significantly different between techniques.
我们比较了改良的单补丁和双补丁手术修复完全房室间隔缺损(CAVSD)对左心室流出道(LVOT)直径和左房室瓣(LAVV)对合的影响。
我们回顾性地分析了 2005 年至 2011 年间接受改良的单补丁或双补丁修复的所有 CAVSD 患者的术后二维超声心动图。我们在心尖四腔观测量 LAVV 的瓣叶对合长度。LVOT 在长轴观测量。
51 例患者在中位年龄 4 个月(1-9 个月)行 CAVSD 修复(单补丁 29 例,双补丁 22 例)。46 次超声心动图的图像分析结果足够。与双补丁修复相比,改良的单补丁修复需要明显更短的旁路时间(102.0±33.6 与 152.9±39.5 分钟,p<0.001)和缺血时间(69.0±21.7 与 106.9±29.7 分钟,p<0.001)。单补丁和双补丁修复的间隔和侧壁瓣的指数对合长度无差异(3.1±2.3 与 4.1±3.1 mm/m2,p=0.25;2.3±2.3 与 3.3±3.0 mm/m2,p=0.21)。两组的 LVOT 直径指数无差异(26.1±5.2 与 28.5±7.1 mm/m2,p=0.22)。在中位随访时间 35 个月(1-69 个月)期间,无院内或晚期死亡。5 例患者在单补丁修复后再次手术(3 例为残余室间隔缺损[VSD]和 LAVV 反流,1 例为残余 VSD,1 例为起搏器植入)。双补丁修复后,1 例因残余 VSD 和右房室瓣反流需再次手术(p=0.22)。
改良的单补丁修复旁路时间和心肌缺血时间明显缩短。两种技术的术后 LVOT 直径和 LAVV 瓣叶对合长度无显著差异。