Pontailler Margaux, Kalfa David, Garcia Enrique, Ly Mohamedou, Le Bret Emmanuel, Roussin Régine, Lambert Virginie, Stos Bertrand, Capderou André, Belli Emre
Department of Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease, Marie Lannelongue Hospital/M3C, University Paris-Sud, Le Plessis-Robinson, France.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Mar;45(3):557-62; discussion 563. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt392. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
Postoperative left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) dysfunction is known to be the principal risk factor influencing outcome after repair of all types of atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD). The purpose of the present study was to identify the risk factors for reoperation and to assess the outcomes after reoperation for LAVV dysfunction.
Records of 412 patients who underwent anatomical repair for different types of AVSD from January 2000 to July 2012 were reviewed. The study group (n = 60) included 13 additional patients for whom repair ± LAVV reoperation was performed in a primary institution. Outcomes, independent risk factors, reoperation and death were analysed.
There were 7 early, (1.7%) and 1 late death. Forty-seven (11.4%) required 64 reoperations for LAVV dysfunction. The median delay for the first LAVV reoperation was 3.5 months (range: 5 days to 10.0 years). Unbalanced ventricles with small left ventricle [odds ratio (OR) = 4.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.58-10.44, P = 0.004], double-orifice LAVV (OR = 5.04, 95% CI: 1.39-18.27, P = 0.014), prior palliative surgery (OR = 3.5, 95% CI: 1.14-10.8, P = 0.029) and discharge echocardiography documenting LAVV regurgitation grade >2 (OR = 21.96, 95% CI: 8.91-54.09, P < 0.001) were found to be independent risk factors for LAVV reoperation. Twelve-year survival and freedom from LAVV reoperation rates were, respectively, 96.1% (95% CI: 94.1-98.1) and 85.8% (95% CI: 81.3-90.3). Survival was significantly worse in patients who underwent LAVV reoperation (P < 0.001) and in those who underwent valve replacement vs valve repair (P = 0.020).
After AVSD repair, LAVV dysfunction appears to be the principal factor that influences outcome. It can usually be managed by repair. Need for multiple reoperations is not uncommon. Long-term outcome in patients with repaired LAVV is favourable.
已知术后左房室瓣(LAVV)功能障碍是影响各类房室间隔缺损(AVSD)修复术后结局的主要危险因素。本研究旨在确定再次手术的危险因素,并评估LAVV功能障碍再次手术后的结局。
回顾了2000年1月至2012年7月期间412例行不同类型AVSD解剖修复术患者的记录。研究组(n = 60)包括另外13例在一家主要机构接受修复±LAVV再次手术的患者。分析了结局、独立危险因素、再次手术和死亡情况。
有7例早期死亡(1.7%)和1例晚期死亡。47例(11.4%)因LAVV功能障碍需要进行64次再次手术。首次LAVV再次手术的中位延迟时间为3.5个月(范围:5天至10.0年)。发现左心室小的不平衡心室[比值比(OR)= 4.06,95%置信区间(CI):1.58 - 10.44,P = 0.004]、双孔LAVV(OR = 5.04,95% CI:1.39 - 18.27,P = 0.014)、既往姑息性手术(OR = 3.5,95% CI:1.14 - 10.8,P = 0.029)以及出院超声心动图记录LAVV反流分级>2(OR = 21.96,95% CI:8.91 - 54.09,P < 0.001)是LAVV再次手术的独立危险因素。12年生存率和无LAVV再次手术率分别为96.1%(95% CI:94.1 - 98.1)和85.8%(95% CI:81.3 - 9O.3)。接受LAVV再次手术的患者生存率显著更差(P < 0.001),接受瓣膜置换术与瓣膜修复术的患者生存率也有显著差异(P = 0.020)。
AVSD修复术后,LAVV功能障碍似乎是影响结局的主要因素。通常可通过修复进行处理。需要多次再次手术的情况并不少见。LAVV修复患者的长期结局良好。