Department of Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(2):986-94. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01972-13. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
Conventional therapy for human cytomegalovirus (CMV) relies on inhibition of the viral DNA polymerase. Ganciclovir (GCV) is the first-line therapy, but when GCV-resistant strains emerge, alternative therapies are extremely limited and are associated with significant toxicities. Combination of anti-CMV agents that act on different targets or stages of virus replication has not been well studied, mostly because of the limited number of anti-CMV agents. We report our investigation of combinations of agents that inhibit CMV by targeting the viral DNA polymerase, cellular kinases, or other cell/virus mechanisms yet to be discovered. The selected compounds differed by the slopes of their dose-response curve: compounds with a slope of 1 (GCV) representing one target or noncooperativity and compounds with high slopes indicating positive cooperativity. Analysis of anti-CMV drug combinations using the Bliss model (which accounts for the slope parameter) distinguished between combinations with synergistic, antagonistic, and additive activities. The combination of GCV and foscarnet was slightly synergistic; strong synergism was found when GCV was used with artemisinin-derived monomers or dimers or the MEK inhibitor U0126. The combination of GCV and cardiac glycosides (digoxin, digitoxin, and ouabain) was additive. The monomeric artemisinin artesunate was synergistic when combined with U0126 or the multikinase inhibitor sunitinib. However, the combination of artemisinin-derived dimers (molecular weights, 606 and 838) and U0126 or sunitinib was antagonistic. These results demonstrate that members of a specific drug class show similar patterns of combination with GCV and that the slope parameter plays an important role in the evaluation of drug combinations. Lastly, antagonism between different classes of CMV inhibitors may assist in target identification and improve the understanding of CMV inhibition by novel compounds.
人巨细胞病毒 (CMV) 的传统疗法依赖于抑制病毒 DNA 聚合酶。更昔洛韦 (GCV) 是一线治疗药物,但当出现 GCV 耐药株时,替代疗法极为有限,且与显著的毒性相关。作用于病毒复制的不同靶点或阶段的抗 CMV 药物联合应用尚未得到充分研究,这主要是因为抗 CMV 药物的数量有限。我们报告了对通过靶向病毒 DNA 聚合酶、细胞激酶或其他有待发现的细胞/病毒机制来抑制 CMV 的药物联合应用的研究。所选化合物的剂量反应曲线斜率不同:斜率为 1(GCV)的化合物代表一个靶点或非协同性,而斜率较高的化合物则表示存在正协同性。使用 Bliss 模型(考虑斜率参数)对抗 CMV 药物联合应用进行分析,可区分具有协同、拮抗和相加作用的联合应用。GCV 和膦甲酸的联合应用略有协同作用;当 GCV 与青蒿素衍生的单体或二聚体或 MEK 抑制剂 U0126 联合应用时,发现强烈协同作用。GCV 与强心苷(地高辛、洋地黄毒苷和哇巴因)联合应用为相加作用。单体青蒿素青蒿琥酯与 U0126 或多激酶抑制剂舒尼替尼联合应用时具有协同作用。然而,青蒿素衍生的二聚体(分子量分别为 606 和 838)与 U0126 或舒尼替尼的联合应用具有拮抗作用。这些结果表明,特定药物类别的成员与 GCV 联合应用具有相似的模式,斜率参数在药物联合应用评价中发挥着重要作用。最后,不同类别的 CMV 抑制剂之间的拮抗作用可能有助于确定靶点,并提高对新型化合物抑制 CMV 的理解。