Gidding Luc G, Spigt Mark G, Dinant Geert-Jan
Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University/CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Fam Pract. 2014 Apr;31(2):180-92. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmt072. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
Numerous intensive research projects to assess the effects of stepped collaborative care (SCC) for depressed patients have been reported in primary care, yet it is unclear how SCC is sustained in usual care.
To assess how SCC for depression is actually being used and how it performs in usual primary care by studying medical data that are routinely collected in family practice, outside the research setting.
Retrospective before and after comparison of electronic medical records (EMR) regarding the implementation of an SCC depression programme in a large primary care organization from 2003 to 2012. Depression care parameters included prevalences, minimal interventions, Beck Depression Inventory-2 (BDI-2), antidepressants, referrals to psychologists and psychiatrists and primary health care consumption.
After programme implementation, differentiation between levels of depression severity increased, more patients were treated with minimal interventions and more patients were monitored with BDI-2. These effects occurred in both nonseverely and severely depressed patients, although they were larger for patients registered as nonseverely depressed. Antidepressant prescription rates and referral rates seemed not to have been influenced by the SCC programme. Health care consumption of the depressed patients increased significantly.
The depression care parameters changed to a different extent and at a different pace than after previous implementation initiatives. Future research should identify whether SCC uptake in primary care is best enhanced by intensive external guidance or by making care providers themselves responsible for the implementation. Analyses of EMR can be valuable in monitoring the implementation effects, especially after research projects are completed.
在初级保健中,已有大量关于评估阶梯式协作护理(SCC)对抑郁症患者影响的深入研究项目被报道,但尚不清楚SCC在常规护理中是如何持续开展的。
通过研究在家庭医疗中常规收集的、研究环境之外的医疗数据,评估抑郁症的SCC实际应用情况及其在常规初级保健中的表现。
对2003年至2012年在一个大型初级保健机构实施SCC抑郁症项目前后的电子病历(EMR)进行回顾性比较。抑郁症护理参数包括患病率、最小干预措施、贝克抑郁量表第二版(BDI-2)、抗抑郁药、转介给心理学家和精神科医生的情况以及初级卫生保健消耗。
项目实施后,抑郁症严重程度分级的差异有所增加,更多患者接受了最小干预措施治疗,更多患者接受了BDI-2监测。这些效果在非重度和重度抑郁症患者中均有出现,尽管在登记为非重度抑郁症的患者中效果更为明显。抗抑郁药处方率和转介率似乎未受SCC项目影响。抑郁症患者的卫生保健消耗显著增加。
抑郁症护理参数的变化程度和速度与以往实施举措后的情况不同。未来的研究应确定,通过强化外部指导还是让护理提供者自身负责实施,能最好地促进初级保健中SCC的采用。电子病历分析在监测实施效果方面可能很有价值,尤其是在研究项目完成后。