University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Burns. 2014 May;40(3):365-73. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.10.026. Epub 2013 Nov 24.
The aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review to identify and appraise the evidence on possible association of the site of venous catheter insertion in burn patients and an increased occurrence of catheter-related infection. Searches were performed in MEDLINE, LILACS, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library. Nine studies were selected for the review; four of them mentioned, directly or indirectly, an association between catheter-related infection and the insertion of the catheter either in the burn wound or in surrounding area, and five studies investigated the occurrence of infection related to both the catheter and the anatomical sites of catheter insertion. Higher infection rates occurred when the catheters were inserted directly in the burn wound or near the wound (level of evidence IV) or in the femoral vein (level of evidence IV). No significant differences in infection occurrence rates were observed between central catheters and peripherally inserted central catheter (level of evidence IV). Further investigations for techniques and types of coverage of venous catheter insertion dressings are important for preventing infection in burn patients. Also, new technologies for venous access must be evaluated.
本研究旨在进行系统评价,以确定并评估静脉导管插入部位与烧伤患者导管相关感染发生率增加之间可能存在关联的证据。检索了 MEDLINE、LILACS、CINAHL、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 The Cochrane Library。选择了 9 项研究进行综述;其中 4 项直接或间接提到了导管相关感染与导管插入烧伤创面或周围区域之间的关联,5 项研究调查了与导管和导管插入的解剖部位相关的感染发生率。当导管直接插入烧伤创面或创面附近(证据水平 IV)或股静脉(证据水平 IV)时,感染发生率较高。中心导管和外周插入中心导管(证据水平 IV)之间的感染发生率无显著差异。对于预防烧伤患者感染,静脉导管插入部位敷料的技术和类型的进一步研究非常重要。此外,还必须评估静脉通路的新技术。