Oncology (Williston Park). 2013 Sep;27(9):924-8, 930.
The treatment of patients with multiple myeloma has dramatically changed over the past 10 years due to an improved understanding of plasma cell biology and the development of new targets. The subset of these patients with non-secretory myeloma-a group of patients who do not secrete immunoglobulin or its component parts into either the blood or urine-has been challenging to treat and to assess for disease response. Newer methods of assessment for plasma cell disorders, such as the widely used serum free light chain assay, have reduced the number of patients with truly non-secretory myeloma to less than 3% of all newly diagnosed myeloma patients. With regard to prognosis, it appears from most series that patients with non-secretory myeloma have a prognosis similar to or better than that of patients with secretory myeloma.This has not been evaluated in populations from which patients with free light-only disease are excluded, but there is no reason to expect that outcomes in patients with non-secretory myeloma will be appreciably worse, since many harbor the t(11;14) translocation. Finally, imaging with positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scans, and minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment with multi-parameter flow cytometry, may provide newer methods for response assessment, something that has been severely limited in these patients due to the lack of a reliable biomarker. Future directions in response assessment include the amalgamation of imaging and MRD assessment, which may enhance our ability to assess response both in patients with non-secretory myeloma and in other patients with myeloma.
由于对浆细胞生物学的认识不断提高和新靶点的开发,过去 10 年来,多发性骨髓瘤患者的治疗发生了巨大变化。这些患者中有一部分是非分泌型骨髓瘤患者——一组既不在血液中也不在尿液中分泌免疫球蛋白或其组成部分的患者。这些患者的治疗和疾病反应评估一直具有挑战性。浆细胞疾病评估的新方法,如广泛使用的血清游离轻链检测,已经将真正的非分泌型骨髓瘤患者数量减少到所有新诊断骨髓瘤患者的不到 3%。就预后而言,从大多数研究来看,非分泌型骨髓瘤患者的预后与分泌型骨髓瘤患者相似或更好。这在排除了仅有游离轻链疾病的患者的人群中尚未得到评估,但没有理由预期非分泌型骨髓瘤患者的结局会明显更差,因为许多患者都存在 t(11;14)易位。最后,正电子发射断层扫描 (PET)/CT 扫描的成像和用多参数流式细胞术进行的微小残留病 (MRD) 评估可能为反应评估提供新的方法,由于缺乏可靠的生物标志物,这些患者的反应评估受到严重限制。反应评估的未来方向包括将成像和 MRD 评估相结合,这可能增强我们评估非分泌型骨髓瘤患者和其他骨髓瘤患者反应的能力。