Suppr超能文献

现代产科护理中的可用性和可及性:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。

Availability and access in modern obstetric care: a retrospective population-based study.

机构信息

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

BJOG. 2014 Feb;121(3):290-9. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12510. Epub 2013 Nov 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the availability of obstetric institutions, the risk of unplanned delivery outside an institution and maternal morbidity in a national setting in which the number of institutions declined from 95 to 51 during 30 years.

DESIGN

Retrospective population-based, three cohorts and two cross-sectional analyses.

SETTING

Census data, Statistics Norway. The Medical Birth Registry of Norway from 1979 to 2009.

POPULATION

Women (15-49 years), 2000 (n = 1,050,269) and 2010 (n = 1,127,665). Women who delivered during the period 1979-2009 (n = 1,807,714).

METHODS

Geographic Information Systems software for travel zone calculations. Cross-table and multiple logistic regression analysis of change over time and regional differences. World Health Organization Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmOC) indicators.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of women living outside the 1-hour travel zone to obstetric institutions. Risk of unplanned delivery outside obstetric institutions. Maternal morbidity.

RESULTS

The proportion of women living outside the 1-hour zone for all obstetric institutions increased from 7.9% to 8.8% from 2000 to 2010 (relative risk, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.12), and for emergency obstetric care from 11.0% to 12.1% (relative risk, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.11). The risk of unplanned delivery outside institutions increased from 0.4% in 1979-83 to 0.7% in 2004-09 (adjusted odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-2.2). Maternal morbidity increased from 1.7% in 2000 to 2.2% in 2009 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.5) and the regional differences increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The availability of and access to obstetric institutions was reduced and we did not observe the expected decrease in maternal morbidity following the centralisation.

摘要

目的

评估在 30 年内,产科机构数量从 95 家减少到 51 家的国家环境中,产科机构的可用性、计划外分娩风险和产妇发病率。

设计

回顾性基于人群的三队列和两横断面分析。

设置

挪威人口普查数据,挪威统计数据。1979 年至 2009 年的挪威医学出生登记处。

人群

15-49 岁的女性,2000 年(n=1050269)和 2010 年(n=1127665)。1979-2009 年分娩的女性(n=1807714)。

方法

地理信息系统软件用于旅行区计算。随时间和区域差异的交叉表和多逻辑回归分析变化。世界卫生组织紧急产科和新生儿护理(EmOC)指标。

主要观察指标

居住在产科机构 1 小时车程以外的女性比例。计划外分娩风险在产科机构之外。产妇发病率。

结果

2000 年至 2010 年,所有产科机构的女性居住在 1 小时区域外的比例从 7.9%增加到 8.8%(相对风险,1.1;95%置信区间,1.11-1.12),紧急产科护理从 11.0%增加到 12.1%(相对风险,1.1;95%置信区间,1.09-1.11)。计划外分娩风险从 1979-83 年的 0.4%增加到 2004-09 年的 0.7%(调整后的优势比,2.0;95%置信区间,1.9-2.2)。产妇发病率从 2000 年的 1.7%增加到 2009 年的 2.2%(调整后的优势比,1.4;95%置信区间,1.2-1.5),且区域差异增大。

结论

产科机构的可用性和可及性降低,我们没有观察到中央集权后产妇发病率预期下降。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验