Psychology Discipline, College of Arts, Victoria University, POB 14428, Melbourne, VIC, 8001, Australia,
Arch Sex Behav. 2014 May;43(4):823-32. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0197-7. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
This study examined whether relationship quality, dispositional jealousy, and attitudes towards monogamy were associated with gay men's satisfaction with the agreements they have in their relationships about extra-dyadic sex. Three types of sexual agreement were examined: closed (no extra-dyadic sex is allowed), monogamish (extra-dyadic sex is allowed only when both members of the couple are present), and open (extra-dyadic sex is allowed). Results from a 2010 survey of 772 gay men in relationships indicated that sexual agreement satisfaction was positively associated with levels of intimacy and commitment for all three types of sexual agreement, but was differentially associated with sexual satisfaction within the relationship, jealousy, and monogamy attitudes as a function of sexual agreement type. Mean levels of sexual satisfaction, jealousy, and monogamy attitudes also differed between types of agreement. These findings provided preliminary evidence that sexual agreement satisfaction may be influenced by different factors depending on the type of agreement, which has useful implications for professionals with gay male clients experiencing dissatisfaction with their agreement or with their relationship more generally.
本研究考察了关系质量、性格嫉妒和对一夫一妻制的态度是否与男同性恋者对其关系中关于婚外性行为的协议的满意度有关。研究考察了三种类型的性协议:封闭型(不允许有婚外性行为)、一夫一妻制(仅当夫妻双方都在场时才允许有婚外性行为)和开放型(允许有婚外性行为)。2010 年对 772 名处于恋爱关系中的男同性恋者的调查结果表明,对于所有三种类型的性协议,性协议满意度与亲密程度和承诺水平呈正相关,但与性关系中的性满意度、嫉妒和一夫一妻制态度的相关性因性协议类型而异。性满意度、嫉妒和一夫一妻制态度的平均水平也因协议类型而异。这些发现初步表明,性协议满意度可能受到不同因素的影响,具体取决于协议类型,这对与男同性恋者客户有协议不满或关系一般不满的专业人士有实际意义。