Suppr超能文献

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的预防性抗生素治疗

Prophylactic antibiotic therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

作者信息

Herath Samantha C, Poole Phillippa

机构信息

Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, 431 Glebe Point Road, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2037.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 28(11):CD009764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009764.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been renewal of interest in the use of prophylactic antibiotics to reduce the frequency of exacerbations and improve quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether or not regular treatment of COPD patients with prophylactic antibiotics reduces exacerbations or affects quality of life.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register and bibliographies of relevant studies. The latest literature search was August 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared prophylactic antibiotics with placebo in patients with COPD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methods of The Cochrane Collaboration. Data were extracted and analysed by two independent review authors.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven RCTs involving 3170 patients were included in this systematic review. All studies were published between 2001 and 2011. Five studies were of continuous antibiotics and two studies were of intermittent antibiotic prophylaxis (termed 'pulsed' for this review). The antibiotics investigated were azithromycin, erythromycin, clarithromycin and moxifloxacin. Azithromycin, erythromycin and clarithromycin are macrolides while moxifloxacin is a fourth-generation synthetic fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent. The study duration varied from three months to 36 months and all used intention-to-treat analysis. Most of the results were of moderate quality. The risk of bias of the included studies was generally low, and we did not downgrade the quality of evidence for risk of bias.The trials recruited participants with a mean age of 66 years and with at least a moderate severity of COPD. Three trials included participants with frequent exacerbations and two trials recruited participants requiring systemic steroids or antibiotics, or both, or who were at the end stage of their disease and required oxygen.The primary outcomes for this review were the number of exacerbations and quality of life.With use of continuous prophylactic antibiotics the number of patients experiencing an exacerbation was reduced (odds ratio (OR) 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39 to 0.77, 3 studies, 1262 participants, high quality). This represented a reduction from 69% of participants in the control group compared to 54% in the treatment group (95% CI 46% to 63%) and the number needed to treat to prevent one exacerbation (NNTb) was therefore 8 (95% CI 5 to 18). The frequency of exacerbations was also reduced with continuous prophylactic antibiotic treatment (rate ratio 0.73; 95% CI 0.58 to 0.91).Use of pulsed antibiotic treatment showed a non-significant reduction in the number of people with exacerbations (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.09, 1 study, 1149 participants, moderate quality) and the test for interaction showed that this result was significantly different from the effect on exacerbations with continuous antibiotics.There was a statistically significant improvement in quality of life with both continuous and pulsed antibiotic treatment but this was smaller than the four unit improvement that is regarded as being clinically significant (MD -1.78; 95% CI -2.95 to -0.61, 2 studies, 1962 participants, moderate quality).Neither pulsed nor continuous antibiotics showed a significant effect on the secondary outcomes of frequency of hospital admissions, change in lung function, serious adverse events or all-cause mortality (moderate quality evidence).The adverse events that were recorded varied among the trials depending on the different antibiotics used. Azithromycin was associated with a significant hearing loss in the treatment group. The moxifloxacin pulsed study reported a significantly higher number of adverse events in the treatment arm due to the marked increase in gastrointestinal adverse events (P < 0.001). Some adverse events that led to drug discontinuation, such as development of long QTc or tinnitus, were not significantly more frequent in the treatment group than the placebo group but pose important considerations in clinical practice.The development of antibiotic resistance in the community is of major concern. One study found newly colonised patients to have higher rates of antibiotic resistance. Patients colonised with moxifloxacin-sensitive pseudomonas at initiation of therapy rapidly became resistant with the quinolone treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Use of continuous prophylactic antibiotics results in a clinically significant benefit in reducing exacerbations in COPD patients. All trials of continuous antibiotics used macrolides hence the noted benefit applies only to the use of continuous macrolide antibiotics. The impact of pulsed antibiotics remains uncertain and requires further research.The trials in this review included patients who were frequent exacerbators and needed treatment with antibiotics or systemic steroids, or who were on supplemental oxygen. There were also older individuals with a mean age of 66 years. The results of these trials apply only to the group of patients who were studied in these trials and may not be generalisable to other groups.Because of concerns about antibiotic resistance and specific adverse effects, consideration of prophylactic antibiotic use should be mindful of the balance between benefits to individual patients and the potential harms to society created by antibiotic overuse.

摘要

背景

人们对使用预防性抗生素以降低慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重频率并改善生活质量的兴趣再度兴起。

目的

确定对COPD患者常规使用预防性抗生素是否能减少急性加重或影响生活质量。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane Airways Group试验注册库及相关研究的参考文献。最新文献检索时间为2013年8月。

入选标准

比较预防性抗生素与安慰剂治疗COPD患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。

数据收集与分析

我们采用Cochrane协作网的标准方法。数据由两名独立的综述作者提取和分析。

主要结果

本系统综述纳入了7项涉及3170例患者的RCT。所有研究均发表于2001年至2011年之间。5项研究为持续使用抗生素,2项研究为间歇性抗生素预防(本综述称为“脉冲式”)。所研究的抗生素有阿奇霉素、红霉素、克拉霉素和莫西沙星。阿奇霉素、红霉素和克拉霉素为大环内酯类,而莫西沙星是第四代合成氟喹诺酮类抗菌剂。研究持续时间从3个月到36个月不等,均采用意向性分析。大多数结果质量为中等。纳入研究的偏倚风险总体较低,我们未因偏倚风险而降低证据质量。试验纳入的参与者平均年龄为66岁,COPD严重程度至少为中度。3项试验纳入了急性加重频繁的参与者,2项试验纳入了需要全身使用类固醇或抗生素或两者都需要的参与者,或处于疾病终末期且需要吸氧的参与者。本综述的主要结局为急性加重次数和生活质量。持续使用预防性抗生素可减少急性加重患者数量(比值比(OR)0.55;95%置信区间(CI)0.39至0.77,3项研究,1262名参与者,高质量)。这意味着对照组69%的参与者出现急性加重,而治疗组为54%(95%CI 46%至63%),因此预防一次急性加重所需治疗人数(NNTb)为8(95%CI 5至18)。持续预防性抗生素治疗也可降低急性加重频率(率比0.73;95%CI 0.58至0.91)。脉冲式抗生素治疗显示急性加重人数减少但无统计学意义(OR 0.87;95%CI 0.69至1.09,1项研究,1149名参与者,中等质量),交互作用检验显示该结果与持续使用抗生素对急性加重的影响有显著差异。持续和脉冲式抗生素治疗均可使生活质量有统计学意义的改善,但小于被视为具有临床意义的4分改善(MD -1.78;95%CI -2.95至-0.61,2项研究,1962名参与者,中等质量)。脉冲式和持续使用抗生素对住院频率、肺功能变化、严重不良事件或全因死亡率等次要结局均无显著影响(中等质量证据)。各试验记录的不良事件因使用的抗生素不同而有所差异。治疗组中阿奇霉素与显著的听力损失相关。莫西沙星脉冲式研究报告治疗组不良事件显著增多,原因是胃肠道不良事件明显增加(P < 0.001)。一些导致停药的不良事件,如长QTc或耳鸣的发生,在治疗组中并不比安慰剂组更频繁,但在临床实践中是重要考虑因素。社区中抗生素耐药性的产生是主要关注点。一项研究发现新定植患者的抗生素耐药率更高。治疗开始时对莫西沙星敏感的假单胞菌定植患者,喹诺酮治疗后迅速产生耐药。

作者结论

持续使用预防性抗生素对减少COPD患者急性加重有临床显著益处。所有持续使用抗生素的试验均使用大环内酯类,因此所述益处仅适用于持续使用大环内酯类抗生素。脉冲式抗生素的影响仍不确定,需要进一步研究。本综述中的试验纳入了急性加重频繁且需要抗生素或全身使用类固醇治疗的患者,或需要吸氧的患者。也有平均年龄为66岁的老年个体。这些试验的结果仅适用于这些试验中所研究的患者群体,可能不适用于其他群体。由于对抗生素耐药性和特定不良反应的担忧,考虑使用预防性抗生素时应权衡对个体患者的益处与抗生素过度使用对社会造成的潜在危害之间的平衡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验