• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生技术评估优先事项设定模型:立陶宛的经验

A model for HTA priority setting: experience in Lithuania.

作者信息

Jankauskiene Danguole, Petronyte Gintare

机构信息

Mykolas Romeris University.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Oct;29(4):450-5. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000470.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462313000470
PMID:24290339
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To promote the further development of HTA, this study aims to design a model for HTA priority setting, which would address national needs for a country with little experience in the field of HTA, and assess its feasibility for the health system.

METHODS

Literature search and review, as well as qualitative research have been used in the design and testing of the model for HTA priority setting. To test the model and the methodology, a three-round Delphi study was conducted in 2011 in the form of an electronic questionnaire, which was distributed to the panel of eleven national experts. The panel was composed of experts representing various fields of the health care sector: policy-makers, health care service professionals and academics, with diverse professional roles.

RESULTS

The designed model consists of four stages: (i) selection of experts for the panel, (ii) indication and selection of health policy topics, (iii) identification of health technologies, and (iv) priority setting. Three rounds of the Delphi study were performed to test the model and reach expert consensus on a list of health technologies for assessment, including pharmaceuticals, vaccines, medical devices, diagnostic methods, public health interventions, organizational systems, etc.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the Delphi technique as a method for consensus building, the model for HTA priority setting was developed for Lithuania; however, it could also be used for other countries with little experience in the field of HTA.

摘要

目的

为促进卫生技术评估(HTA)的进一步发展,本研究旨在设计一种HTA优先级设定模型,该模型将满足一个在HTA领域经验较少的国家的国家需求,并评估其在卫生系统中的可行性。

方法

文献检索与综述以及定性研究已用于HTA优先级设定模型的设计和测试。为了测试该模型和方法,2011年以电子问卷的形式进行了三轮德尔菲研究,问卷分发给了由11名国家专家组成的小组。该小组由代表医疗保健部门各个领域的专家组成:政策制定者、医疗保健服务专业人员和学者,具有不同的专业角色。

结果

设计的模型包括四个阶段:(i)专家小组的选择;(ii)卫生政策主题的指示和选择;(iii)卫生技术的识别;(iv)优先级设定。进行了三轮德尔菲研究以测试该模型,并就一份用于评估的卫生技术清单达成专家共识,这些技术包括药品、疫苗、医疗设备、诊断方法、公共卫生干预措施、组织系统等。

结论

基于德尔菲技术作为达成共识的方法,为立陶宛开发了HTA优先级设定模型;然而,它也可用于其他在HTA领域经验较少的国家。

相似文献

1
A model for HTA priority setting: experience in Lithuania.卫生技术评估优先事项设定模型:立陶宛的经验
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Oct;29(4):450-5. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000470.
2
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
3
Health technology assessment: research trends and future priorities in Europe.卫生技术评估:欧洲的研究趋势和未来重点。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Jul;16 Suppl 2:6-15. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011050.
4
[Priority setting for the health technology assessment].[卫生技术评估的优先级设定]
Rev Med Chil. 2014 Jan;142 Suppl 1:S22-6. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872014001300004.
5
Practical tools and methods for health technology assessment in Europe: structures, methodologies, and tools developed by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA.在欧洲进行卫生技术评估的实用工具和方法:欧洲卫生技术评估网络(EUnetHTA)制定的结构、方法和工具。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Dec;25 Suppl 2:1-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309990626.
6
Historical development of health technology assessment in Thailand.泰国卫生技术评估的历史发展
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25 Suppl 1:241-52. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090709. Epub 2009 Jun 16.
7
Development of health technology assessment in Lithuania.立陶宛卫生技术评估的发展
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25 Suppl 1:140-2. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090552.
8
Defining products for a new health technology assessment agency in Madrid, Spain: a survey of decision makers.为西班牙马德里一家新的卫生技术评估机构界定产品:对决策者的一项调查
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Winter;24(1):60-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462307080087.
9
Health technology assessment and priority setting for universal health coverage: a qualitative study of stakeholders' capacity, needs, policy areas of demand and perspectives in Nigeria.卫生技术评估和全民健康覆盖的优先事项制定:尼日利亚利益攸关方能力、需求、政策领域需求和观点的定性研究。
Global Health. 2020 Jul 8;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00583-2.
10
Mapping of health technology assessment in selected countries.部分国家卫生技术评估情况概述
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Oct;29(4):424-34. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000469.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing the Iranian health insurance benefit optimization model - the IR-HIBOM: a multicriteria decision analysis with decision rules for designing basic health insurance benefit packages.开发伊朗医疗保险福利优化模型——IR-HIBOM:一种用于设计基本医疗保险福利套餐的具有决策规则的多标准决策分析。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Jul 21;41(1):e50. doi: 10.1017/S0266462325100263.
2
Selection and Prioritization of Medical Devices for HTA Evaluation: A Systematic Review of Existing Approaches.用于卫生技术评估的医疗设备的选择与优先级确定:对现有方法的系统评价
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00981-w.
3
Topic selection for health technology assessment: An approach combining multiple attribute decision making and decision rules.
卫生技术评估的主题选择:一种结合多属性决策和决策规则的方法。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021 Mar 27;35:40. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.40. eCollection 2021.
4
Systematic review for the development of a pharmaceutical and medical products prioritization framework.用于制定药品和医疗产品优先排序框架的系统评价。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2019 Aug 21;12:21. doi: 10.1186/s40545-019-0181-2. eCollection 2019.
5
The health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: A systematic review of the current evidence.卫生系统选择卫生技术的优先排序标准:当前证据的系统评价
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 Feb 16;30:329. eCollection 2016.
6
A model for priority setting of health technology assessment: the experience of AHP-TOPSIS combination approach.一种卫生技术评估优先级设定模型:层次分析法-理想解排序法组合方法的经验
Daru. 2016 Apr 11;24:10. doi: 10.1186/s40199-016-0148-7.