Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.
Siemens Healthcare China, Beijing, China.
Clin Radiol. 2014 Feb;69(2):e93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.09.019. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
To evaluate the image quality of dual-energy abdominal computed tomography (DECT) angiography (CTA) with a non-linear image blending technique as compared with the linear image blending technique and standard single-energy CT (SECT; 120 kVp SECT) imaging.
Thirty-two patients underwent dual-source, dual-energy abdominal CTA (80 kVp/140 kVp mode) in the arterial phase to generate non-linear image blending and 0.5 linear image blending images. Abdominal vessel enhancement, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were evaluated and compared to the conventional 120 kVp SECT image sets (n = 29) using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni adjustment. Two radiologists assessed subjective vessel enhancement in consensus. The effective dose was calculated and compared using Student's t-test.
The non-linear image blending images were ranked highest (over 0.5 linear image blending and 120 kVp SECT images) regarding mean vascular attenuation, CNR, SNR, and subjective image quality evaluation (p-values ranging from <0.001-0.021). However, there was no significant difference in renal artery branch visualization among the three sets of images (p = 0.405). Linear image blending images showed improved vascular attenuation (p = 0.011) as compared with 120 kVp SECT images, but displayed similar results regarding CNRs (p = 0.045) and SNRs (p = 0.053). The effective radiation dose for the DECT protocol was much lower than the SECT protocol (p = 0.004).
The non-linear image blending technique of 80 kVp/140 kVp DECT improved vascular visualization by improving contrast enhancement in abdominal CTA during the arterial phase.
评估非线性图像混合技术与线性图像混合技术和标准单能量 CT(SECT;120 kVp SECT)成像相比,在双能腹部 CT 血管造影(CTA)中的图像质量。
32 例患者行双源双能腹部 CTA(80 kVp/140 kVp 模式)于动脉期生成非线性图像混合和 0.5 线性图像混合图像。使用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)和 Bonferroni 调整,对腹部血管强化、图像噪声、信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)进行评估,并与常规 120 kVp SECT 图像组(n = 29)进行比较。两位放射科医生对主观血管强化进行了共识评估。使用 Student's t 检验比较有效剂量。
非线性图像混合图像在平均血管衰减、CNR、SNR 和主观图像质量评估方面(p 值范围为 <0.001-0.021)均优于 0.5 线性图像混合和 120 kVp SECT 图像。然而,三组图像在肾动脉分支可视化方面无显著差异(p = 0.405)。线性图像混合图像与 120 kVp SECT 图像相比,血管强化得到改善(p = 0.011),但 CNR(p = 0.045)和 SNR(p = 0.053)结果相似。DECT 方案的有效辐射剂量明显低于 SECT 方案(p = 0.004)。
80 kVp/140 kVp DECT 的非线性图像混合技术通过改善腹部 CTA 动脉期的对比增强,改善了血管可视化。