UNC Horizons and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carrboro, NC 27510, USA; Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Department of Neuroscience, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA 24450, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Jan 1;134:414-417. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
Buprenorphine pharmacotherapy for opioid-dependent pregnant women is associated with maternal and neonatal outcomes superior to untreated opioid dependence. However, the literature is inconsistent regarding the possible existence of a dose-response relationship between maternal buprenorphine dose and neonatal clinical outcomes.
The present secondary analysis study (1) examined the relationship between maternal buprenorphine dose at delivery and neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) peak score, estimated gestational age at delivery, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, neonatal head circumference, length, and weight at birth, amount of morphine needed to treat NAS, duration of NAS treatment, and duration of neonatal hospital stay and (2) compared neonates who required pharmacotherapy for NAS to neonates who did not require such pharmacotherapy on these same outcomes, in 58 opioid-dependent pregnant women receiving buprenorphine as participants in a randomized clinical trial.
(1) Analyses failed to provide evidence of a relationship between maternal buprenorphine dose at delivery and any of the 10 outcomes (all p-values>.48) and (2) significant mean differences between the untreated (n=31) and treated (n=27) for NAS groups were found for duration of neonatal hospital stay and NAS peak score (both p-values<.001).
(1) Findings failed to support the existence of a dose-response relationship between maternal buprenorphine dose at delivery and any of 10 neonatal clinical outcomes, including NAS severity and (2) that infants treated for NAS had a higher mean NAS peak score and, spent a longer time in the hospital than did the group not treated for NAS is unsurprising.
在治疗妊娠合并阿片类药物依赖的孕妇中,丁丙诺啡药理学治疗与未经治疗的阿片类药物依赖相比,具有更好的母婴结局。然而,文献对于产妇丁丙诺啡剂量与新生儿临床结局之间是否存在剂量反应关系尚不一致。
本二次分析研究(1)检验了产妇分娩时丁丙诺啡剂量与新生儿戒断综合征(NAS)评分峰值、估计分娩时胎龄、1 分钟和 5 分钟时的 Apgar 评分、新生儿头围、出生时的身长和体重、治疗 NAS 所需的吗啡量、NAS 治疗持续时间以及新生儿住院时间之间的关系,(2)在 58 名接受丁丙诺啡作为随机临床试验参与者的阿片类药物依赖孕妇中,比较了需要 NAS 药物治疗的新生儿与不需要这种药物治疗的新生儿在上述相同结局上的差异。
(1)分析未提供证据表明产妇分娩时丁丙诺啡剂量与 10 项结局中的任何一项存在关系(所有 p 值>.48),(2)在未经治疗(n=31)和治疗(n=27)NAS 组之间,新生儿住院时间和 NAS 评分峰值的差异具有统计学意义(p 值均<.001)。
(1)结果未支持产妇分娩时丁丙诺啡剂量与 10 项新生儿临床结局(包括 NAS 严重程度)之间存在剂量反应关系,(2)接受 NAS 治疗的婴儿 NAS 评分峰值更高,住院时间更长,这并不奇怪。