Dericioglu Nese, Arsava Ethem Murat, Topcuoglu Mehmet Akif
Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2014 Oct;45(4):293-298. doi: 10.1177/1550059413503639. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
The availability of video electroencephalography monitoring (VEEGM) in neurological intensive care units has allowed the recognition and treatment of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). However, little is known about characteristics, management, and outcomes in patients with NCSE in developing countries. We retrospectively reviewed the video-EEG reports of 120 patients who were monitored from November 2009 to March 2013. Indications for video-EEG were mostly unexplained alterations of consciousness or witnessed convulsive seizures. We identified the clinical characteristics, treatment regimes, and outcomes of patients with NCSE and tried to determine which parameters were associated with prognosis. NCSE was detected in 12/120 (10%) patients (3 females, 9 males; age 24-86 years). Admission diagnoses were: stroke (3), epilepsy (3), autoimmune limbic encephalitis (3), herpes encephalitis (1), presumed encephalitis-cardiac arrest (1), and malignancy (1). Eight patients had witnessed convulsive seizures before video-EEG. Interictal periodic epileptiform discharges were detected in 9 patients. In one-third of patients, ≥2 EEG recordings were required to capture seizures. In addition to anticonvulsants, 3 patients received immunosuppressive therapy, while intravenous anesthetics were given to 7 patients. Four patients (33.3%; 1 female, 3 males; age 51-67 years; etiology: stroke, autoimmune encephalitis, encephalitis-cardiac arrest, and malignancy; Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score <8 in 3 patients; all had periodic discharges; intravenous anesthetics were used) died in the intensive care unit. NCSE is not an infrequent finding in neurological intensive care units, thus necessitating prolonged video-EEG monitoring in patients at risk. Witnessed convulsions may indicate the presence of nonconvulsive seizures in patients with altered consciousness. Repeated recordings may increase the detection of ictal events. Periodic epileptiform discharges are commonly observed and may predict poor prognosis. Mortality seems to be influenced mostly by the underlying etiology.
神经重症监护病房中视频脑电图监测(VEEGM)的应用使得非惊厥性癫痫持续状态(NCSE)得以识别和治疗。然而,在发展中国家,关于NCSE患者的特征、管理及预后情况知之甚少。我们回顾性分析了2009年11月至2013年3月期间接受监测的120例患者的视频脑电图报告。视频脑电图检查的指征主要是意识状态不明原因改变或有惊厥发作。我们确定了NCSE患者的临床特征、治疗方案及预后情况,并试图确定哪些参数与预后相关。120例患者中有12例(10%)检测到NCSE(女性3例,男性9例;年龄24 - 86岁)。入院诊断包括:中风(3例)、癫痫(3例)、自身免疫性边缘叶脑炎(3例)、疱疹性脑炎(1例)、疑似脑炎 - 心脏骤停(1例)和恶性肿瘤(1例)。8例患者在视频脑电图检查前有惊厥发作。9例患者检测到发作间期周期性癫痫样放电。三分之一的患者需要≥2次脑电图记录才能捕捉到癫痫发作。除抗惊厥药物外,3例患者接受了免疫抑制治疗,7例患者使用了静脉麻醉药。4例患者(33.3%;女性1例,男性3例;年龄51 - 67岁;病因:中风(3例)、自身免疫性脑炎、脑炎 - 心脏骤停和恶性肿瘤;3例患者格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分<8;均有周期性放电;使用了静脉麻醉药)在重症监护病房死亡。NCSE在神经重症监护病房中并非罕见,因此有必要对高危患者进行长时间的视频脑电图监测。有惊厥发作可能提示意识改变患者存在非惊厥性癫痫发作。重复记录可能会增加发作事件的检测率。周期性癫痫样放电常见,可能预示预后不良。死亡率似乎主要受潜在病因影响。