Department of Psychology.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Apr;40(2):653-68. doi: 10.1037/a0034997. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
Many studies have shown that previewing the next word n + 1 during reading leads to substantial processing benefit (e.g., shorter word viewing times) when this word is eventually fixated. However, evidence of such preprocessing in fixations on the preceding word n when in fact the information about the preview is acquired is far less consistent. A recent study suggested that such effects may be delayed into fixations on the next word n + 1 (Risse & Kliegl, 2012). To investigate the time course of parafoveal information-acquisition on the control of eye movements during reading, we conducted 2 gaze-contingent display-change experiments and orthogonally manipulated the processing difficulty (i.e., word frequency) of an n + 1 preview word and its validity relative to the target word. Preview difficulty did not affect fixation durations on the pretarget word n but on the target word n + 1. In fact, the delayed preview-difficulty effect was almost of the same size as the preview benefit associated with the n + 1 preview validity. Based on additional results from quantile-regression analyses on the time course of the 2 preview effects, we discuss consequences as to the integration of foveal and parafoveal information and potential implications for computational models of eye guidance in reading.
许多研究表明,在阅读过程中预览下一个词 n + 1 会导致实质性的处理收益(例如,缩短单词的注视时间),当这个词最终被注视时。然而,当实际上获取了关于预览的信息时,在前一个词 n 上的注视中存在这种预处理的证据远不那么一致。最近的一项研究表明,这种效应可能会延迟到下一个词 n + 1 的注视中(Risse & Kliegl,2012)。为了研究在阅读过程中眼球运动控制中旁视网膜信息获取的时间进程,我们进行了 2 个注视相关的显示变化实验,并正交地操纵了 n + 1 预览词的处理难度(即词频)及其相对于目标词的有效性。预览难度不会影响对前目标词 n 的注视持续时间,但会影响对目标词 n + 1 的注视持续时间。事实上,延迟的预览难度效应几乎与与 n + 1 预览有效性相关的预览收益一样大。基于对 2 个预览效应的时间进程的分位数回归分析的其他结果,我们讨论了对中央和旁视网膜信息的整合的后果,并对阅读中眼球引导的计算模型提出了潜在的影响。