Saylor C F, Brandt B J
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1986 Oct;7(5):308-13. doi: 10.1097/00004703-198610000-00006.
The concurrent validity of the Minnesota Child Development Inventory (MCDI) was assessed by comparing the MCDI General Development Scale score and each of the seven area subscale scores to mental age on the Bayley Mental Scale. Subjects were 115 infants (8-30 months old) with suspected developmental delay who were referred to one of two hospitals' pediatric psychology services by their physicians. Correlations were obtained for the entire sample as well as for three chronological age (CA) groups within the sample. Overall validity was supported by significant correlations ranging from 0.75 to 0.91 in the total sample. Variations in the magnitude and patterns of correlations within CA were noted, and suggested groups for which certain scales of the MCDI may be less comparable to the Bayley. Overall results suggest that the MDCI may yield consistent information about the development of infants' skills.
通过将明尼苏达儿童发展量表(MCDI)的总体发展量表得分以及七个领域子量表得分分别与贝利智力量表上的心理年龄进行比较,来评估MCDI的同时效度。研究对象为115名疑似发育迟缓的婴儿(8至30个月大),他们由医生转介至两家医院之一的儿科心理服务部门。对整个样本以及样本中的三个实足年龄(CA)组进行了相关性分析。整个样本中显著的相关性在0.75至0.91之间,支持了总体效度。注意到CA组内相关性的大小和模式存在差异,这表明MCDI的某些量表可能与贝利量表的可比性较低的分组。总体结果表明,MDCI可能会得出关于婴儿技能发展的一致信息。