Palisano R J
Phys Ther. 1986 Nov;66(11):1714-9. doi: 10.1093/ptj/66.11.1714.
Concurrent and predictive validities of the Bayley Motor Scale and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales were examined by administering both tests to 23 full-term and 21 healthy premature infants at 12, 15, and 18 months of age. For both groups, a correlation analysis of age-equivalent scores indicated Bayley scores had good to high correlation with Peabody gross motor scores (range, r = .78 to r = .96) and unacceptable correlation with Peabody fine motor scores (range, r = .20 to r = .57). When results were reported using standardized quotients, mean Bayley quotients for the full-term infant group were significantly higher than Peabody gross motor quotients. Prediction of motor development at 18 months of age was limited (range, r = .25 to r = .60), with the exception of Peabody fine motor scores for the premature infant group (r = .75). This study provides evidence of concurrent validity between Bayley motor and Peabody gross motor age-equivalent scores, and it suggests the need for further testing, using separate assessments of gross motor and fine motor ability, to determine motor development at later ages.
通过在12、15和18月龄时对23名足月健康婴儿和21名早产健康婴儿同时进行贝利运动量表和皮博迪发育运动量表测试，来检验这两种量表的同时效度和预测效度。对于两组婴儿，年龄当量分数的相关性分析表明，贝利量表分数与皮博迪量表的大运动分数具有良好至高的相关性（范围：r = 0.78至r = 0.96），而与皮博迪量表的精细运动分数的相关性则不可接受（范围：r = 0.20至r = 0.57）。当使用标准化商数报告结果时，足月婴儿组的贝利商数均值显著高于皮博迪量表的大运动商数。除早产婴儿组的皮博迪量表精细运动分数外（r = 0.75），18月龄时运动发育的预测能力有限（范围：r = 0.25至r = 0.60）。本研究提供了贝利运动量表与皮博迪量表大运动年龄当量分数之间同时效度的证据，并表明需要进一步测试，通过对大运动和精细运动能力进行单独评估，以确定后期的运动发育情况。
