Usman Muhammad, Ali Mumtaz, Khanzada Khalid, Ishaq Mohammad, Aman Raza, Ali Mohammad
Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Medical Institute, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013 Dec;23(12):852-6.
To assess the feasibility and efficacy of a novel, minimally invasive spinal surgery technique for the correction of lumbar spinal stenosis involving unilateral approach for bilateral decompression.
Cross-sectional observational study.
Neurosurgery Department of PGMI, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, from January to December 2010.
A total of 60 patients with lumbar stenosis were randomly assigned to undergo either a conventional laminectomy (30 patients, Group A), or a unilateral approach (30 patients, Group B). Clinical outcomes was measured using the scale of Finneson and Cooper. All the data was collected by using a proforma and different parameters were assessed for a minimum follow-up period of three months. Data was analyzed by descriptive statistics using SPSS software version 17.
Adequate decompression was achieved in all patients. Compared with patients in the conventional laminectomy group, patients who received the novel procedure (unilateral approach) had a reduced mean duration of hospital stay, a faster recovery rate and majority of the patients (88.33%) had an excellent to fair operative result according to the Finneson and Cooper scale. Five major complications occurred in all patient groups, 2 patients had unintended dural rent and 2 wound dehiscence each and fifth patient had worsening of symptoms. There was no mortality in the series.
The ultimate goal of the unilateral approach to treat lumbar spinal stenosis is to achieve adequate decompression of the neural elements. An additional benefit of a minimally invasive approach is adequate preservation of vertebral stability, as it requires only minimal muscle trauma, preservation of supraspinous/intraspinous ligament complex and spinous process, therefore, allows early mobilization. This also shortens the hospital stay, reduces postoperative back pain, and leads to satisfactory outcome.
评估一种新型微创脊柱手术技术用于矫正涉及单侧入路双侧减压的腰椎管狭窄症的可行性和疗效。
横断面观察性研究。
2010年1月至12月,白沙瓦市雷丁夫人医院PGMI神经外科。
总共60例腰椎管狭窄症患者被随机分配接受传统椎板切除术(30例患者,A组)或单侧入路手术(30例患者,B组)。使用芬内森和库珀量表测量临床结果。所有数据通过一份表格收集,并对不同参数进行评估,最短随访期为三个月。使用SPSS软件17版通过描述性统计分析数据。
所有患者均实现了充分减压。与传统椎板切除术组的患者相比,接受新手术(单侧入路)的患者平均住院时间缩短,恢复速度更快,并且根据芬内森和库珀量表,大多数患者(88.33%)手术结果为优至良。所有患者组共发生5例主要并发症,2例患者意外出现硬脊膜撕裂,2例患者伤口裂开,第五例患者症状恶化。该系列中无死亡病例。
单侧入路治疗腰椎管狭窄症的最终目标是实现神经结构的充分减压。微创入路的另一个好处是充分保留了椎体稳定性,因为它只需要最小程度的肌肉创伤,保留棘上/棘间韧带复合体和棘突,因此允许早期活动。这也缩短了住院时间,减轻了术后背痛,并带来了满意的结果。