Zerbib Philippe, Vinet Alexis, Rogosnitzky Moshe, Truant Stéphanie, Chambon Jean Pierre, Pruvot Francois René
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Lille, Université Nord de France, 59000, Lille, France,
World J Surg. 2014 May;38(5):1233-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2389-7.
For selected cases of severe caustic injuries, evidence favors conservative management, consisting of radiographic and clinical observation without emergency surgery. However, this approach can lead to the development of gastric distension caused by combined esophageal and antral strictures, called gastrocele. This study assessed the safety of a two-stage surgical treatment for gastrocele.
Patients treated in our department between 2004 and 2010 for caustic injury who did not receive emergency surgery and subsequently developed gastrocele were retrospectively analysed. Demographic information, symptoms, and ingestion history were documented. Surgical management included partial gastrectomy and postponed esophageal stricture treatment. Outcome measures included postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Eight nonoperated patients with severe caustic injury from suicidal ingestions of caustic substances were found to have developed gastrocoele. They presented with mostly endoscopic stage IIIb esophageal and gastric injuries. All patients had clinical symptoms of vomiting and abdominal tenderness at day 8 after caustic ingestion. Antrectomy and esophageal stricture treatment were performed at an average of 2 and 8 months, respectively, after caustic ingestion. There were no postoperative deaths, and the long-term survival rate was 83 %.
Gastrocele should be suspected in patients with stage III gastric and esophageal injuries who have been treated by conservative management and are still vomiting more than 1 week postingestion. A two-staged surgical strategy of antrectomy followed by a postponed esophageal stricture treatment was found to be safe and effective for these patients.
对于某些严重腐蚀性损伤病例,有证据支持采用保守治疗,即通过影像学和临床观察,而非急诊手术。然而,这种方法可能导致因食管和胃窦联合狭窄引起的胃扩张,即胃膨出。本研究评估了胃膨出两阶段手术治疗的安全性。
对2004年至2010年在我科接受治疗的腐蚀性损伤患者进行回顾性分析,这些患者未接受急诊手术,随后出现胃膨出。记录人口统计学信息、症状和摄入史。手术管理包括部分胃切除术和延期食管狭窄治疗。观察指标包括术后发病率和死亡率。
发现8例因自杀性摄入腐蚀性物质导致严重腐蚀性损伤的未手术患者出现了胃膨出。他们大多表现为内镜下IIIb期食管和胃损伤。所有患者在摄入腐蚀性物质后第8天均有呕吐和腹部压痛的临床症状。分别在摄入腐蚀性物质后平均2个月和8个月进行了胃窦切除术和食管狭窄治疗。无术后死亡病例,长期生存率为83%。
对于采用保守治疗且摄入后1周以上仍有呕吐症状的III期胃和食管损伤患者,应怀疑胃膨出。对于这些患者,先进行胃窦切除术,然后延期进行食管狭窄治疗的两阶段手术策略被发现是安全有效的。