Antiel Ryan M, James Katherine M, Egginton Jason S, Sheeler Robert D, Liebow Mark, Goold Susan Dorr, Tilburt Jon C
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Feb;29(2):399-403. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2718-4.
Little is known about how U.S. physicians’ political affiliations, specialties, or sense of social responsibility relate to their reactions to health care reform legislation.
To assess U.S. physicians’ impressions about the direction of U.S. health care under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), whether that legislation will make reimbursement more or less fair, and examine how those judgments relate to political affiliation and perceived social responsibility.
A cross-sectional, mailed, self-reported survey.
Simple random sample of 3,897 U.S.physicians.
Views on the ACA in general, reimbursement under the ACA in particular, and perceived social responsibility.
Among 2,556 physicians who responded (RR2: 65 %), approximately two out of five (41 %) believed that the ACA will turn U.S. health care in the right direction and make physician reimbursement less fair (44 %). Seventy-two percent of physicians endorsed a general professional obligation to address societal health policy issues, 65 % agreed that every physician is professionally obligated to care for the uninsured or underinsured, and half (55 %) were willing to accept limits on coverage for expensive drugs and procedures for the sake of expanding access to basic health care. In multivariable analyses, liberals and independents were both substantially more likely to endorse the ACA (OR 33.0 [95 % CI, 23.6–46.2]; OR 5.0 [95 % CI, 3.7–6.8], respectively), as were physicians reporting a salary (OR 1.7 [95 % CI, 1.2–2.5])or salary plus bonus (OR 1.4 [95 % CI, 1.1–1.9)compensation type. In the same multivariate models, those who agreed that addressing societal health policy issues are within the scope of their professional obligations (OR 1.5 [95 % CI, 1.0–2.0]), who believe physicians are professionally obligated to care for the uninsured / under-insured (OR 1.7 [95 % CI,1.3–2.4]), and who agreed with limiting coverage for expensive drugs and procedures to expand insurance coverage (OR 2.3 [95 % CI, 1.8–3.0]), were all significantly more likely to endorse the ACA. Surgeons and procedural specialists were less likely to endorse it (OR 0.5 [95 % CI, 0.4–0.7], OR 0.6 [95 %CI, 0.5–0.9], respectively).
Significant subsets of U.S. physicians express concerns about the direction of U.S. health care under recent health care reform legislation. Those opinions appear intertwined with political affiliation,type of medical specialty, as well as perceived social responsibility.
关于美国医生的政治派别、专业领域或社会责任感如何影响他们对医疗改革立法的反应,我们所知甚少。
评估美国医生对《平价医疗法案》(ACA)下美国医疗保健方向的看法,该立法是否会使报销更加公平或不公平,并研究这些判断与政治派别和感知到的社会责任之间的关系。
一项横断面邮寄自填式调查。
3897名美国医生的简单随机样本。
对ACA的总体看法,特别是ACA下的报销情况,以及感知到的社会责任。
在2556名回复的医生中(回复率:65%),约五分之二(41%)的人认为ACA将使美国医疗保健朝着正确方向发展,但会使医生报销变得不那么公平(44%)。72%的医生认可解决社会健康政策问题的一般职业义务,65%的人同意每位医生在职业上有义务照顾未参保或参保不足的人,一半(55%)的人愿意为扩大基本医疗保健的可及性而接受对昂贵药物和治疗的覆盖限制。在多变量分析中,自由主义者和独立人士都更有可能认可ACA(分别为OR 33.0 [95% CI,23.6 - 46.2];OR 5.0 [95% CI,3.7 - 6.8]),领取薪水(OR 1.7 [95% CI,1.2 - 2.5])或薪水加奖金(OR 1.4 [95% CI,1.1 - 1.9])薪酬类型的医生也是如此。在相同的多变量模型中,那些同意解决社会健康政策问题属于其职业义务范围的人(OR 1.5 [95% CI,1.0 - 2.0])、认为医生在职业上有义务照顾未参保/参保不足者的人(OR 1.7 [95% CI,1.3 - 2.4])以及同意限制昂贵药物和治疗的覆盖范围以扩大保险覆盖的人(OR 2.3 [95% CI,1.8 - 3.0]),都显著更有可能认可ACA。外科医生和操作专科医生不太可能认可ACA(分别为OR 0.5 [95% CI,0.4 - 0.7],OR 0.6 [95% CI,0.5 - 0.9])。
相当一部分美国医生对近期医疗改革立法下美国医疗保健的方向表示担忧。这些观点似乎与政治派别、医学专业类型以及感知到的社会责任相互交织。