Collins J L, Lin Y, Patek P Q
Cell Biol Int Rep. 1986 Oct;10(10):789-96. doi: 10.1016/0309-1651(86)90149-9.
For cell lines, the correlation of the in vitro expression of contact-inhibition to the in vivo expression of the nontumorigenic phenotype, and the correlation of the expression of contact-noninhibition (i.e., focus formation) to the expression of the tumorigenic phenotype are commonly used as a means to identify, in vitro, cells which presumably have undergone malignant transformation such that, if tested, they would grow as tumors in vivo. In this report we show that while this correlation is true for contact-noninhibited transformants induced by benzo(a)pyrene (BP), a DNA mutating and demethylating agent, it is not true for contact-noninhibited transformants induced by 5-azacytidine (AZC), a DNA demethylating agent which does not have mutagenic activity. The in vitro treatment of a contact-inhibited cell line with 5-azacytidine (AZC) results in the expression of contact-noninhibited transformants, which, in vitro quantitatively and qualitatively similar to those induced by BP but unlike BP, treatment with AZC does not result in the in vivo expression of tumorigenicity.
对于细胞系而言,体外接触抑制的表达与体内非致瘤表型的表达之间的相关性,以及接触非抑制(即集落形成)的表达与致瘤表型的表达之间的相关性,通常被用作一种在体外鉴定可能已经发生恶性转化的细胞的方法,这样,如果进行测试,它们在体内会以肿瘤的形式生长。在本报告中,我们表明,虽然这种相关性对于由苯并(a)芘(BP,一种DNA诱变和去甲基化剂)诱导的接触非抑制转化体是成立的,但对于由5-氮杂胞苷(AZC,一种没有诱变活性的DNA去甲基化剂)诱导的接触非抑制转化体则不成立。用5-氮杂胞苷(AZC)对接触抑制的细胞系进行体外处理会导致接触非抑制转化体的表达,这些转化体在体外在数量和质量上与由BP诱导的转化体相似,但与BP不同的是,用AZC处理不会导致体内致瘤性的表达。