Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
Laryngoscope. 2014 Jun;124(6):1459-63. doi: 10.1002/lary.24544. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Antimicrobial prophylaxis is still a matter of debate in ear surgeries. Previous studies have focused on prophylaxis in middle ear surgery alone without inclusion of mastoidectomy. We therefore investigated efficacy of two regimes of antimicrobial prophylaxis in tympanoplasty with cortical mastoidectomy done for mild middle ear disease in chronic otitis media.
Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study.
Patients undergoing tympanoplasty with cortical mastoidectomy were included and randomized into two study groups. The group I patients received parenteral perioperative antimicrobials; only group II patients received additional extended oral antimicrobials for 8 days more postoperatively. Primary outcomes evaluated were postaural wound infection and graft success, assessed weekly until 1 month. Adverse events and length of hospital stay were evaluated as secondary outcome.
Seventy-eight patients were randomized into group I (n = 39) and group II (n = 39). The two groups showed no difference in wound infection rate. The graft success rate in both the group was comparable (94.87% in group I and 97.44% in group II, respectively; P = 1.00). The length of hospital stay was significantly longer (P = 0.00001) in group II (3.05 [0.72], mean [SD]) as compared to group I (2.36 [0.49]). During the first postoperative week, a significantly higher incidence of gastrointestinal disturbances were observed in group II (19 [48.72%] as compared to 1 [2.56%] in group I, P = 0.00001).
The present study shows that there is no need of extended antimicrobial prophylaxis for tympanoplasty with cortical mastoidectomy done for mild middle ear disease. An indiscriminate use of antimicrobials may lead to increase incidence of adverse events and prolonged hospital stay.
1b.
目的/假设:抗菌预防仍然是耳部手术中的一个争议问题。以前的研究仅集中于中耳手术中的预防,而不包括乳突切除术。因此,我们研究了慢性中耳炎轻度中耳疾病行鼓室成形术伴皮质乳突切除术时两种抗菌预防方案的疗效。
前瞻性、随机、对照、双盲研究。
纳入并随机分为两组行鼓室成形术伴皮质乳突切除术的患者。第 I 组患者接受围手术期的静脉内抗菌药物;仅第 II 组患者在术后再接受 8 天的延长口服抗菌药物治疗。主要结局评估是术后耳后伤口感染和移植物成功率,直至术后 1 个月每周评估一次。将不良事件和住院时间作为次要结局进行评估。
78 例患者随机分为第 I 组(n = 39)和第 II 组(n = 39)。两组在伤口感染率方面无差异。两组的移植物成功率相似(第 I 组为 94.87%,第 II 组为 97.44%;P = 1.00)。第 II 组的住院时间明显更长(P = 0.00001)(3.05 [0.72],平均值[标准差]),而第 I 组为(2.36 [0.49])。在术后第一周,第 II 组观察到胃肠道不适的发生率明显更高(19 [48.72%],而第 I 组为 1 [2.56%];P = 0.00001)。
本研究表明,对于轻度中耳疾病行鼓室成形术伴皮质乳突切除术,无需延长抗菌预防。抗菌药物的无差别使用可能导致不良事件发生率增加和住院时间延长。
1b。