Tas Faruk, Karabulut Senem, Serilmez Murat, Ciftci Rumeysa, Duranyildiz Derya
Institute of Oncology, University of Istanbul, Capa, 34390, Istanbul, Turkey,
Tumour Biol. 2014 Apr;35(4):3095-102. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1401-z. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
Cellular adhesion molecules might be good markers in some types of malignant tumors, useful information in diagnosis and prognosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the serum levels of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EPCAM) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. Fifty patients were enrolled into the study. Serum EPCAM and VCAM-1 levels were determined by the solid-phase sandwich ELISA method. Age- and sex-matched 30 healthy controls were included in the analysis. The median age of the patients was 56.5 years, range 22 to 83 years. Majority of the patients had advanced disease (stages III-IV) (90%). The baseline serum EPCAM levels of the EOC patients were significantly higher than in those in the control group (p = 0.03). However, there was no significant difference in the serum VCAM-1 level between EOC patients and controls (p = 0.24). Metastatic patients had higher serum VCAM-1 levels compared with the non-metastatic patients (p = 0.03). Moreover, no other clinical variables including response to chemotherapy were found to be correlated with both serum assays (p > 0.05). No correlation was found between serum EPCAM and VCAM-1 levels in EOC patients (r(s) = 0.105, p = 0.362). Neither serum EPCAM level nor serum VCAM-1 level had significant adverse effect on survival. In conclusion, the higher baseline serum levels of VCAM-1 were associated with metastatic disease, and serum EPCAM level was found to be a diagnostic marker in EOC patients. However, both serum assays had no prognostic roles on outcome.
细胞黏附分子可能是某些类型恶性肿瘤的良好标志物,对诊断和预后有重要信息价值。本研究的目的是评估上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者血清中上皮细胞黏附分子(EPCAM)和血管细胞黏附分子-1(VCAM-1)的水平。50例患者纳入本研究。采用固相夹心酶联免疫吸附测定法测定血清EPCAM和VCAM-1水平。分析纳入了30名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照者。患者的中位年龄为56.5岁,范围为22至83岁。大多数患者患有晚期疾病(III-IV期)(90%)。EOC患者的基线血清EPCAM水平显著高于对照组(p = 0.03)。然而,EOC患者与对照组之间血清VCAM-1水平无显著差异(p = 0.24)。与非转移患者相比,转移患者的血清VCAM-1水平更高(p = 0.03)。此外,未发现包括化疗反应在内的其他临床变量与两种血清检测结果相关(p > 0.05)。EOC患者血清EPCAM和VCAM-1水平之间未发现相关性(r(s) = 0.105,p = 0.362)。血清EPCAM水平和血清VCAM-1水平均对生存无显著不良影响。总之,较高的基线血清VCAM-1水平与转移性疾病相关,血清EPCAM水平是EOC患者的诊断标志物。然而,两种血清检测对预后均无作用。