Jing-Juan Shang, Hui Xu, Rong-Zhu Tang, Yue-Bin Dong, Division of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Seventh People's Hospital, Shanghai 200137, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov 28;19(44):8071-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i44.8071.
To evaluate the therapeutic effect of Shugan-decoction (SGD) on visceral hyperalgesia and colon gene expressions using a rat model.
Ninety-six adult male Wistar rats were randomized into six equal groups for assessment of SGD effects on psychological stress-induced changes using the classic water avoidance stress (WAS) test. Untreated model rats were exposed to chronic (1 h/d for 10 d consecutive) WAS conditions; experimental treatment model rats were administered with intragastric SGD at 1 h before WAS on consecutive days 4-10 (low-dose: 0.1 g/mL; mid-dose: 0.2 g/mL; high-dose: 0.4 g/mL); control treatment model rats were similarly administered with the irritable bowel syndrome drug, dicetel (0.0042 g/mL); untreated normal control rats received no drug and were not subjected to the WAS test. At the end of the 10-d WAS testing period, a semi-quantitative measurement of visceral sensitivity was made by assessing the abdominal withdrawal reflex (AWR) to colorectal balloon-induced distension (at 5 mmHg increments) to determine the pain pressure threshold (PPT, evidenced by pain behavior). Subsequently, the animals were sacrificed and colonic tissues collected for assessment of changes in expressions of proteins related to visceral hypersensitivity (transient receptor potential vanilloid 1, TRPV1) and sustained visceral hyperalgesia (substance P, SP) by immunohistochemistry and real-time polymerase chain reaction. Inter-group differences were assessed by paired t test or repeated measures analysis of variance.
The WAS test successfully induced visceral hypersensitivity, as evidenced by a significantly reduced AWR pressure in the untreated model group as compared to the untreated normal control group (190.4 ± 3.48 mmHg vs 224.0 ± 4.99 mmHg, P < 0.001). SGD treatments at mid-dose and high-dose and the dicetel treatment significantly increased the WAS-reduced PPT (212.5 ± 2.54, 216.5 ± 3.50 and 217.7 ± 2.83 mmHg respectively, all P < 0.001); however, the low-dose SGD treatment produced no significant effect on the WAS-reduced PPT (198.3 ± 1.78 mmHg, P > 0.05). These trends corresponded to the differential expressions observed for both TRPV1 protein (mid-dose: 1.64 ± 0.08 and high-dose: 1.69 ± 0.12 vs untreated model: 3.65 ± 0.32, P < 0.001) and mRNA (0.44 ± 0.16 and 0.15 ± 0.03 vs 1.39 ± 0.15, P < 0.001) and SP protein (0.99 ± 0.20 and 1.03 ± 0.23 vs 2.03 ± 0.12, P < 0.01) and mRNA (1.64 ± 0.19 and 1.32 ± 0.14 vs 2.60 ± 0.33, P < 0.05). These differential expressions of TRPV1 and SP related to mid- and high-dose SGD treatments were statistically similar to the changes induced by dicetel treatment. No signs of overt damage to the rat system were observed for any of the SGD dosages.
Shugan-decoction can reduce chronic stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity in rats, and the regulatory mechanism may involve mediating the expressions of TRPV1 and SP in colon tissues.
采用大鼠模型评价逍遥散对内脏痛觉过敏和结肠基因表达的治疗作用。
96 只成年雄性 Wistar 大鼠随机分为 6 组,采用经典的水回避应激(WAS)试验评估逍遥散对心理应激变化的影响。未治疗的模型大鼠接受慢性(连续 10 天,每天 1 小时)WAS 条件;实验组大鼠在连续 4-10 天(低剂量:0.1 g/mL;中剂量:0.2 g/mL;高剂量:0.4 g/mL)WAS 前 1 小时给予灌胃逍遥散;对照组大鼠给予同样剂量的治疗肠易激综合征的药物地西替(0.0042 g/mL);未治疗的正常对照组大鼠未给予药物且未进行 WAS 试验。在 10 天 WAS 测试期结束时,通过评估结直肠球囊充气引起的内脏敏感性(每次增加 5 mmHg)的腹壁退缩反射(AWR),对内脏敏感性进行半定量测量,以确定疼痛压力阈值(PPT,表现为疼痛行为)。随后,处死动物并收集结肠组织,通过免疫组化和实时聚合酶链反应评估与内脏超敏相关的蛋白(瞬时受体电位香草酸 1,TRPV1)和持续性内脏痛觉过敏(P 物质,SP)的表达变化。通过配对 t 检验或重复测量方差分析评估组间差异。
WAS 试验成功诱导内脏超敏反应,未治疗模型组的 AWR 压力明显低于未治疗正常对照组(190.4 ± 3.48 mmHg 比 224.0 ± 4.99 mmHg,P < 0.001)。中剂量和高剂量逍遥散治疗以及地西替治疗均显著增加了 WAS 降低的 PPT(212.5 ± 2.54、216.5 ± 3.50 和 217.7 ± 2.83 mmHg,均 P < 0.001);然而,低剂量逍遥散治疗对 WAS 降低的 PPT 无显著影响(198.3 ± 1.78 mmHg,P > 0.05)。这些趋势与 TRPV1 蛋白(中剂量:1.64 ± 0.08 和高剂量:1.69 ± 0.12 与未治疗模型:3.65 ± 0.32,P < 0.001)和 mRNA(0.44 ± 0.16 和 0.15 ± 0.03 与 1.39 ± 0.15,P < 0.001)和 SP 蛋白(0.99 ± 0.20 和 1.03 ± 0.23 与 2.03 ± 0.12,P < 0.01)和 mRNA(1.64 ± 0.19 和 1.32 ± 0.14 与 2.60 ± 0.33,P < 0.05)的差异表达相对应。中剂量和高剂量逍遥散治疗引起的 TRPV1 和 SP 相关差异表达与地西替治疗引起的变化在统计学上相似。在任何逍遥散剂量下,均未观察到大鼠系统明显的损伤迹象。
逍遥散可降低大鼠慢性应激诱导的内脏超敏反应,其调节机制可能涉及调节结肠组织中 TRPV1 和 SP 的表达。