Wen Chen, Department of Educational Administration, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov 28;19(44):8133-40. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i44.8133.
To investigate the clinical usefulness of interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) in the differential diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) from Crohn's disease (CD) by meta-analysis.
A systematic search of English language studies was performed. We searched the following databases: Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy initiative and Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy tool were used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. Sensitivity, specificity, and other measures of the accuracy of IGRAs in the differential diagnosis of ITB from CD were pooled and analyzed using random-effects models. Receiver operating characteristic curves were applied to summarize overall test performance. Two reviewers independently judged study eligibility while screening the citations.
Five studies met the inclusion criteria. The average inter-rater agreement between the two reviewers for items in the quality checklist was 0.95. Analysis of IGRAs for the differential diagnosis of ITB from CD produced summary estimates as follows: sensitivity, 0.74 (95%CI: 0.68-0.80); specificity, 0.87 (95%CI: 0.82-0.90); positive likelihood ratio, 5.98 (95%CI: 3.79-9.43); negative likelihood ratio, 0.28 (95%CI: 0.18-0.43); and diagnostic odds ratio, 26.21 (95%CI: 14.15-48.57). The area under the curve was 0.92. The evaluation of publication bias was not significant (P = 0.235).
Although IGRAs are not sensitive enough, they provide good specificity for the accurate diagnosis of ITB, which may be helpful in the differential diagnosis of ITB from CD.
通过荟萃分析,研究干扰素 - γ释放试验(IGRAs)在肠结核(ITB)与克罗恩病(CD)鉴别诊断中的临床应用。
系统检索英文文献。我们检索了以下数据库:Medline、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library。采用诊断准确性研究的标准报告和质量评估工具来评估研究的方法学质量。采用随机效应模型对 IGRAs 在 ITB 与 CD 鉴别诊断中的准确性进行汇总和分析,包括敏感性、特异性和其他准确性测量指标。应用受试者工作特征曲线总结总体检测性能。两名评审员独立筛选引文以判断研究的合格性。
共有 5 项研究符合纳入标准。两名评审员对质量检查表中项目的平均组内一致性为 0.95。对 IGRAs 用于 ITB 与 CD 鉴别诊断的分析产生了如下汇总估计值:敏感性为 0.74(95%CI:0.68-0.80);特异性为 0.87(95%CI:0.82-0.90);阳性似然比为 5.98(95%CI:3.79-9.43);阴性似然比为 0.28(95%CI:0.18-0.43);诊断比值比为 26.21(95%CI:14.15-48.57)。曲线下面积为 0.92。对发表偏倚的评估不显著(P = 0.235)。
尽管 IGRAs 的敏感性不够,但它们对 ITB 的准确诊断具有良好的特异性,这可能有助于 ITB 与 CD 的鉴别诊断。