• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童创伤严重程度在分诊时是否被高估?一项观察性随访研究。

Is paediatric trauma severity overestimated at triage? An observational follow-up study.

作者信息

DO H Q, Hesselfeldt R, Steinmetz J, Rasmussen L S

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Trauma Centre, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Jan;58(1):98-105. doi: 10.1111/aas.12222. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1111/aas.12222
PMID:24308697
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severe paediatric trauma is rare, and pre-hospital and local hospital personnel experience with injured children is often limited. We hypothesised that a higher proportion of paediatric trauma victims were taken to the regional trauma centre (TC).

METHODS

This is an observational follow-up study that involves one level I TC and seven local hospitals. We included paediatric (< 16 years) and adult (≥ 16-≤ 79 years) trauma patients with a driving distance to the TC > 30 minutes. The primary end-point was the proportion of trauma patients arriving in the TC.

RESULTS

We included 1934 trauma patients, 238 children and 1696 adults. A total of 33/238 children (13.9%) vs. 304/1696 adults (17.9%) were transported to the TC post-injury (P = 0.14). Among these, children were significantly less injured than adults [median Injury Severity Score (ISS) 9 vs. 14, P < 0.01]. There was no significant difference between the groups in the proportion of seriously injured trauma victims (ISS > 15) taken to the TC [8/11 (72.7%) vs. 139/182 (76.4%)]. The corresponding figures for ISS < 15 were 25/227 (11.0%) and 164/1509 (10.9%), respectively. No significant difference was found in intensive care unit length of stay or time to TC arrival. No paediatric vs. 36/1671 (2.2%) adult deaths were observed at 30-day follow-up (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in the proportion of paediatric and adult trauma patients transported to the TC, neither overall nor among severely injured patients. Paediatric trauma patients admitted to the TC were, however, significantly less injured than adults.

摘要

背景

严重儿童创伤较为罕见,院前及当地医院医护人员处理受伤儿童的经验往往有限。我们推测,更高比例的儿童创伤受害者被送往区域创伤中心(TC)。

方法

这是一项观察性随访研究,涉及一家一级创伤中心和七家当地医院。我们纳入了距离创伤中心车程超过30分钟的儿科(<16岁)和成人(≥16 - ≤79岁)创伤患者。主要终点是抵达创伤中心的创伤患者比例。

结果

我们纳入了1934例创伤患者,其中238例儿童和1696例成人。共有33/238例儿童(13.9%)与304/1696例成人(17.9%)在受伤后被转运至创伤中心(P = 0.14)。其中,儿童的受伤程度明显低于成人[损伤严重度评分(ISS)中位数为9 vs. 14,P < 0.01]。两组中被送往创伤中心的重伤创伤受害者(ISS > 15)比例无显著差异[8/11(72.7%)vs. 139/182(76.4%)]。ISS < 15的相应比例分别为25/227(11.0%)和164/1509(10.9%)。在重症监护病房住院时间或抵达创伤中心的时间方面未发现显著差异。在30天随访时,未观察到儿童死亡,而成人死亡36/1671例(2.2%)(P = 0.03)。

结论

在被转运至创伤中心的儿童和成人创伤患者比例方面,总体及重伤患者中均无差异。然而,入住创伤中心的儿童创伤患者受伤程度明显低于成人。

相似文献

1
Is paediatric trauma severity overestimated at triage? An observational follow-up study.儿童创伤严重程度在分诊时是否被高估?一项观察性随访研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Jan;58(1):98-105. doi: 10.1111/aas.12222. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
2
[Pediatric prehospital trauma care. A retrospective comparison of air and ground transportation].[儿科院前创伤护理。空中与地面转运的回顾性比较]
Unfallchirurg. 2002 Nov;105(11):1000-6. doi: 10.1007/s00113-002-0520-6.
3
Pediatric trauma patients are more likely to be discharged from the emergency department after arrival by helicopter emergency medical services.儿科创伤患者在通过直升机紧急医疗服务到达后更有可能从急诊部门出院。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Mar;74(3):917-20. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827e19a4.
4
In-hospital mortality pattern of severely injured children.严重受伤儿童的住院死亡率模式。
Injury. 2012 Dec;43(12):2060-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.12.005. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
5
The mortality benefit of direct trauma center transport in a regional trauma system: a population-based analysis.区域创伤系统中直接创伤中心转运的生存获益:一项基于人群的分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jun;72(6):1510-5; discussion 1515-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318252510a.
6
EMS and emergency department physician triage: injury severity in trauma patients transported by helicopter.紧急医疗服务(EMS)与急诊科医生的分诊:直升机转运创伤患者的损伤严重程度
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005 Apr-Jun;9(2):198-202. doi: 10.1080/10903120590924681.
7
Accuracy of prehospital diagnosis and triage of a Swiss helicopter emergency medical service.瑞士直升机紧急医疗服务院前诊断和分诊的准确性。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Sep;73(3):709-15. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825c14b7.
8
A comparison of pediatric and adult trauma patients transported by helicopter and ground EMS: managed-care considerations.直升机和地面紧急医疗服务转运的儿科与成人创伤患者的比较:管理式医疗考量
Air Med J. 1996 Jan-Mar;15(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/s1067-991x(96)90015-2.
9
Analgesia in the management of paediatric and adolescent trauma during the resuscitative phase: the role of the pediatric trauma centre.复苏阶段小儿及青少年创伤管理中的镇痛:儿科创伤中心的作用
Injury. 2014 May;45(5):845-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.048. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
10
Accuracy of pre-hospital trauma triage and field triage decision rules in children (P2-T2 study): an observational study.院前创伤分诊和现场分诊决策规则在儿童中的准确性(P2-T2 研究):一项观察性研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Apr;4(4):290-298. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30431-6. Epub 2020 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of pre-hospital triage tools for major trauma: a systematic review with meta-analysis and net clinical benefit.院前创伤分诊工具对严重创伤的准确性:系统评价与荟萃分析及净临床获益。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Jun 10;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00372-1.