Joyce Geoffrey F, Zissimopoulos Julie, Goldman Dana P
Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, 3335 S. Figueroa, Unit A, Los Angeles, CA 90007, United States.
J Health Econ. 2013 Dec;32(6):1345-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 May 6.
Despite its success, Medicare Part D has been widely criticized for the gap in coverage, the so-called "doughnut hole". We compare the use of prescription drugs among beneficiaries subject to the coverage gap with usage among beneficiaries who are not exposed to it. We find that the coverage gap does, indeed, disrupt the use of prescription drugs among seniors with diabetes. But the declines in usage are modest and concentrated among higher cost, brand-name medications. Demand for high cost medications such as antipsychotics, antiasthmatics, and drugs of the central nervous system decline by 8-18% in the coverage gap, while use of lower cost medications with high generic penetration such as beta blockers, ACE inhibitors and antidepressants decline by 3-5% after reaching the gap. More importantly, lower adherence to medications is not associated with increases in medical service use.
尽管取得了成功,但医疗保险D部分因覆盖范围缺口,即所谓的“甜甜圈洞”,而受到广泛批评。我们比较了处于覆盖范围缺口的受益人与未受此影响的受益人之间的处方药使用情况。我们发现,覆盖范围缺口确实扰乱了糖尿病老年人的处方药使用。但使用量的下降幅度不大,且集中在成本较高的名牌药物上。在覆盖范围缺口中,抗精神病药、抗哮喘药和中枢神经系统药物等高成本药物的需求下降了8%至18%,而在进入缺口后,β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和抗抑郁药等低成本、高通用名渗透率药物的使用量下降了3%至5%。更重要的是,较低的药物依从性与医疗服务使用的增加并无关联。