Markert Jana, Alff Franziska, Zschaler Silke, Gausche Ruth, Kiess Wieland, Blüher Susann
Department of Women and Child Health, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Leipzig, Germany.
Obes Res Clin Pract. 2013 Dec;7(6):e476-86. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2012.07.008.
Prevention research has to elucidate how families with overweight children can be convinced to participate in obesity intervention trials. Here we describe the detailed recruitment process for a telephone-based obesity prevention programme for families with overweight children and present participation rates, the study design and a socio-demographic description of participating families.
Overweight (BMI > 90th percentile) children and adolescents 4-17 years of age were screened via the German paediatrician network CrescNet. The prevention programme (multiple computer aided telephone counselling interviews) was suggested to eligible families via local paediatricians. Participating families were compared anthropometrically and socio-demographically to the entire screening population and to micro-census data, a representative national survey.
The screening process assessed 4005 candidates for eligibility. Paediatricians reported having suggested programme participation to 3387 candidates (referred to as 100%). 427 candidates (12.6%) returned a written consent for programme participation. 303 candidates (9.0%) started the intervention. The study population (n = 303) included more obese (45.6% vs. 33.2%; p < 0.001) and fewer overweight participants (40.4% vs. 55.2%; p < 0.001) than the entire screening population. Compared to the micro-census, families with adolescents (8.2% vs. 16.9%; p < 0.001) and single parents (16.0% vs. 23.3%; p < 0.005) were underrepresented in the study population, whereas families living in rural areas were overrepresented (58.7% vs. 50.2%; p < 0.005).
Although 84.6% of the paediatricians forwarded the suggestion for programme participation to eligible families, participation rates for this low-threshold; telephone-based obesity intervention remained very low. "Hard-to-engage groups" for effective obesity prevention seem to include single parents, as well as parents of adolescents.
预防研究必须阐明如何说服超重儿童家庭参与肥胖干预试验。在此,我们描述了一项针对超重儿童家庭的基于电话的肥胖预防计划的详细招募过程,并呈现参与率、研究设计以及参与家庭的社会人口学描述。
通过德国儿科医生网络CrescNet对4至17岁的超重(BMI>第90百分位数)儿童和青少年进行筛查。通过当地儿科医生向符合条件的家庭推荐预防计划(多次计算机辅助电话咨询访谈)。将参与家庭的人体测量学和社会人口学特征与整个筛查人群以及微观人口普查数据(一项具有全国代表性的调查)进行比较。
筛查过程评估了4005名候选人的资格。儿科医生报告称已向3387名候选人(称为100%)推荐参与该计划。427名候选人(12.6%)返回了参与该计划的书面同意书。303名候选人(9.0%)开始了干预。与整个筛查人群相比,研究人群(n = 303)中肥胖者更多(45.6%对33.2%;p < 0.001),超重参与者更少(40.4%对55.2%;p < 0.001)。与微观人口普查相比,研究人群中青少年家庭(8.2%对16.9%;p < 0.001)和单亲家庭(16.0%对23.3%;p < 0.005)的代表性不足,而农村地区家庭的代表性过高(58.7%对50.2%;p < 0.005)。
尽管84.6%的儿科医生向符合条件的家庭转发了参与该计划的建议,但这种低门槛、基于电话的肥胖干预的参与率仍然很低。有效预防肥胖的“难以参与的群体”似乎包括单亲家庭以及青少年的父母。