Campbell Narelle, Eley Diann S, McAllister Lindy
School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia.
Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, PO Box 170, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia.
Aust Health Rev. 2014 Feb;38(1):86-92. doi: 10.1071/AH13109.
Allied health (AH) includes many diverse professions, each with a unique contribution to healthcare, making it possible to consider these professions as person oriented (PO) or technique oriented (TO). This paper explored the personality traits of AH professionals from the perspective of both the PO or TO orientation and the individual professions.
AH professionals (n=562) provided demographic data and completed the Temperament and Character Inventory. Examination of the literature and a consultation process resulted in nine professions classified as PO and 10 classified as TO. Multivariate analyses compared levels of personality traits and demographic variables between the PO (n=492) and TO (n=70) groups, and the professions within the groups.
Professionals in the PO group showed significantly higher levels of traits that emphasise person orientation attributes, such as being sociable, empathic and cooperative, compared with AH professionals in professions with an emphasis on TO.
Trends in personality traits among AH professionals were congruent with the PO and TO aspects of their chosen profession. This supports the usefulness of the PO and TO concepts in describing AH professions and may provide new clues for policy aiming to enhance job satisfaction, retention and career development. WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE TOPIC? The literature suggests that certain medical specialities can be classified as person (PO) or technique oriented (TO) and that individuals attracted to those specialties display traits that are similar to that orientation. There is scant information on the AH professions regarding similar person or technique orientations. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD? The diversity of professions within AH allows a new approach to describing each profession as either PO (socially dependent, cooperative and relationship focused), or TO (focused on skills and procedures). The trend in personality traits of individuals in certain AH professions is compatible with the orientation of that profession. Findings suggest that individuals may be attracted to professions that favour a similar personality pattern to their own. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTITIONERS? Gaining an improved understanding of the AH professions and individuals who are attracted to them in a climate of workforce shortage and increasing multidisciplinary service demand. The findings provide a new approach to understanding the characteristics of AH professions according to the personalities they attract. This information could guide recruitment and retention policy, and assist in career counselling by providing greater insight into personality profiles that are best suited to certain professions.
联合健康专业(AH)涵盖众多不同职业,每个职业对医疗保健都有独特贡献,从而有可能将这些职业视为以人为主(PO)或以技术为主(TO)。本文从PO或TO导向以及各个职业的角度探讨了AH专业人员的人格特质。
AH专业人员(n = 562)提供了人口统计学数据并完成了气质与性格问卷。通过文献研究和咨询过程,将九个职业归类为PO,十个职业归类为TO。多变量分析比较了PO组(n = 492)和TO组(n = 70)之间以及组内各职业的人格特质水平和人口统计学变量。
与强调TO的职业中的AH专业人员相比,PO组中的专业人员在强调以人为本属性的特质方面表现出显著更高的水平,例如善于社交、有同理心和合作精神。
AH专业人员的人格特质趋势与其所选职业的PO和TO方面一致。这支持了PO和TO概念在描述AH职业中的有用性,并可能为旨在提高工作满意度、留用率和职业发展的政策提供新线索。关于该主题已知的信息是什么?文献表明某些医学专业可以归类为以人为本(PO)或以技术为主(TO),并且被这些专业吸引的个体表现出与该取向相似的特质。关于AH职业中类似的以人为本或技术为主的取向,信息很少。本文补充了什么?AH职业的多样性允许采用一种新方法,将每个职业描述为PO(社会依赖、合作且注重关系)或TO(注重技能和程序)。某些AH职业中个体的人格特质趋势与该职业的取向相符。研究结果表明,个体可能会被与其自身人格模式相似的职业所吸引。对从业者有什么启示?在劳动力短缺和多学科服务需求不断增加的情况下,更好地了解AH职业以及被这些职业吸引的个体。研究结果提供了一种新方法,根据AH职业所吸引的人格来理解其特征。这些信息可以指导招聘和留用政策,并通过更深入了解最适合某些职业的人格概况来协助职业咨询。