Grant Richard W, Schmittdiel Julie A, Neugebauer Romain S, Uratsu Connie S, Sternfeld Barbara
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, 20th floor, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA,
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Feb;29(2):341-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2693-9. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
Lack of regular physical activity is highly prevalent in U.S. adults and significantly increases mortality risk.
To examine the clinical impact of a newly implemented program ("Exercise as a Vital Sign" [EVS]) designed to systematically ascertain patient-reported exercise levels at the beginning of each outpatient visit.
The EVS program was implemented in four of 11 medical centers between April 2010 and October 2011 within a single health delivery system (Kaiser Permanente Northern California). We used a quasi-experimental analysis approach to compare visit-level and patient-level outcomes among practices with and without the EVS program. Our longitudinal observational cohort included over 1.5 million visits by 696,267 adults to 1,196 primary care providers.
Exercise documentation in physician progress notes; lifestyle-related referrals (e.g. exercise programs, nutrition and weight loss consultation); patient report of physician exercise counseling; weight change among overweight/obese patients; and HbA1c changes among patients with diabetes.
EVS implementation was associated with greater exercise-related progress note documentation (26.2 % vs 23.7 % of visits, aOR 1.12 [95 % CI: 1.11-1.13], p < 0.001) and referrals (2.1 % vs 1.7 %; aOR 1.14 [1.11-1.18], p < 0.001) compared to visits without EVS. Surveyed patients (n = 6,880) were more likely to report physician exercise counseling (88 % vs. 76 %, p < 0.001). Overweight patients (BMI 25-29 kg/m(2), n = 230,326) had greater relative weight loss (0.20 [0.12 - 0.28] lbs, p < 0.001) and patients with diabetes and baseline HbA1c > 7.0 % (n = 30,487) had greater relative HbA1c decline (0.1 % [0.07 %-0.13 %], p < 0.001) in EVS practices compared to non-EVS practices.
Systematically collecting exercise information during outpatient visits is associated with small but significant changes in exercise-related clinical processes and outcomes, and represents a valuable first step towards addressing the problem of inadequate physical activity.
缺乏规律的体育活动在美国成年人中极为普遍,且显著增加死亡风险。
探讨一项新实施的项目(“运动作为生命体征”[EVS])的临床影响,该项目旨在在每次门诊就诊开始时系统地确定患者报告的运动水平。
2010年4月至2011年10月期间,在单一医疗服务系统(北加利福尼亚凯撒医疗集团)的11个医疗中心中的4个实施了EVS项目。我们采用准实验分析方法,比较有无EVS项目的医疗机构在就诊层面和患者层面的结果。我们的纵向观察队列包括696,267名成年人到1,196名初级保健提供者处进行的超过150万次就诊。
医生病程记录中的运动记录;与生活方式相关的转诊(如运动项目、营养和减肥咨询);患者报告的医生运动咨询;超重/肥胖患者的体重变化;以及糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)变化。
与无EVS项目的就诊相比,实施EVS项目与更多与运动相关的病程记录(就诊的26.2%对23.7%,调整后比值比[aOR]1.12[95%置信区间:1.11 - 1.13],p < 0.001)和转诊(2.1%对1.7%;aOR 1.14[1.11 - 1.18],p < 0.001)相关。接受调查的患者(n = 6,880)更有可能报告医生的运动咨询(88%对76%,p < 0.001)。与无EVS项目的医疗机构相比,超重患者(体重指数[BMI]25 - 29 kg/m²,n = 230,326)的相对体重减轻更多(0.20[0.12 - 0.28]磅,p < 0.001),糖尿病且基线HbA1c > 7.0%的患者(n = 30,487)在EVS项目实施的医疗机构中的相对HbA1c下降更多(0.1%[0.07% - 0.13%],p < 0.001)。
在门诊就诊期间系统地收集运动信息与运动相关临床过程和结果的微小但显著变化相关,是解决体育活动不足问题的有价值的第一步。