School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, , Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;48(3):178-81. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093173. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
With measurement of physical activity becoming more common in clinical practice, it is imperative that healthcare professionals become more knowledgeable about the different methods available to objectively measure physical activity behaviour. Objective measures do not rely on information provided by the patient, but instead measure and record the biomechanical or physiological consequences of performing physical activity, often in real time. As such, objective measures are not subject to the reporting bias or recall problems associated with self-report methods. The purpose of this article was to provide an overview of the different methods used to objectively measure physical activity in clinical practice. The review was delimited to heart rate monitoring, accelerometers and pedometers since their small size, low participant burden and relatively low cost make these objective measures appropriate for use in clinical practice settings. For each measure, strengths and weakness were discussed; and whenever possible, literature-based examples of implementation were provided.
随着在临床实践中越来越多地进行身体活动测量,医疗保健专业人员必须更加了解可用于客观测量身体活动行为的不同方法。客观测量不依赖于患者提供的信息,而是测量和记录执行身体活动的生物力学或生理后果,通常是实时的。因此,客观测量不受与自我报告方法相关的报告偏差或回忆问题的影响。本文的目的是提供在临床实践中客观测量身体活动的不同方法的概述。审查仅限于心率监测、加速度计和计步器,因为它们体积小、对参与者的负担小且成本相对较低,因此适合在临床实践环境中使用。对于每种测量方法,都讨论了其优缺点;并在可能的情况下,提供了基于文献的实施示例。