Suppr超能文献

痛苦温度计筛查鼻咽癌长期生存者痛苦的灵敏度和特异度。

Sensitivity and specificity of the Distress Thermometer in screening for distress in long-term nasopharyngeal cancer survivors.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Biology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, PR China.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2013 Dec;20(6):e570-6. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1617.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Distress Thermometer (dt) is a screening tool recommended to quickly identify cancer patients with distress. Our study aimed to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the dt in detecting psychological distress in long-term Chinese nasopharyngeal cancer (npc) survivors.

METHODS

Data for the 442 participating npc survivors were collected through a self-administered questionnaire based on the dt and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (hads). The hads was used to define cases of psychological distress. Positive and negative groups were defined based on 4 hads criteria (Anxiety, Depression, Anxiety or Depression, and overall score). Receiver operating characteristic (roc) curves were used to examine the ability of all possible cut-off values of the dt to detect positive and negative cases. For each roc curve, the area under the curve (auc) was used as an indicator of the overall accuracy of the dt to identify positive cases of distress.

RESULTS

The positive auc values [with 95% confidence intervals (ci)] for the 4 hads criteria were 0.715 (95% ci: 0.667 to 0.764), 0.714 (95% ci: 0.661 to 0.768), 0.724 (95% ci: 0.677 to 0.771), and 0.724 (95% ci: 0.664 to 0.775) respectively. At a cut-off score of 4, the sensitivity of the dt to the four hads criteria was, respectively, 0.366 (95% ci: 0.296 to 0.436), 0.448 (95% ci: 0.364 to 0.532), 0.362 (95% ci: 0.299 to 0.425), and 0.421 (95% ci: 0.339 to 0.502), and the specificity of the dt to the 4 hads criteria was, respectively, 0.860 (95% ci: 0.818 to 0.902), 0.860 (95% ci: 0.821 to 0.899), 0.854 (95% ci: 0.814 to 0.894), and 0.854 (95% ci: 0.814 to 0.894). At a cut-off score of 5, the corresponding sensitivities were lower than those at the cut-off score of 4. All potential cut-off scores showed poor sensitivity (<0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

The roc analysis showed poor discrimination. No potential dt cut-off score had an acceptable sensitivity. The dt showed poor sensitivity in npc survivors. Thus, the dt might not be a valid scale for psychological distress screening in long-term Chinese npc survivors.

摘要

背景

痛苦温度计(dt)是一种推荐用于快速识别有痛苦的癌症患者的筛查工具。我们的研究旨在检查 dt 在检测长期中国鼻咽癌(npc)幸存者心理困扰方面的灵敏度和特异性。

方法

通过基于 dt 和医院焦虑和抑郁量表(hads)的自我管理问卷收集了 442 名参与的 npc 幸存者的数据。使用 hads 来定义心理困扰的病例。阳性和阴性组是根据 4 个 hads 标准(焦虑、抑郁、焦虑或抑郁和总分)来定义的。接收器操作特征(roc)曲线用于检查 dt 所有可能的截断值检测阳性和阴性病例的能力。对于每个 roc 曲线,曲线下面积(auc)被用作 dt 识别阳性病例的整体准确性的指标。

结果

4 个 hads 标准的阳性 auc 值[95%置信区间(ci)]分别为 0.715(95%ci:0.667 至 0.764)、0.714(95%ci:0.661 至 0.768)、0.724(95%ci:0.677 至 0.771)和 0.724(95%ci:0.664 至 0.775)。在截断分数为 4 时,dt 对 4 个 hads 标准的敏感性分别为 0.366(95%ci:0.296 至 0.436)、0.448(95%ci:0.364 至 0.532)、0.362(95%ci:0.299 至 0.425)和 0.421(95%ci:0.339 至 0.502),dt 对 4 个 hads 标准的特异性分别为 0.860(95%ci:0.818 至 0.902)、0.860(95%ci:0.821 至 0.899)、0.854(95%ci:0.814 至 0.894)和 0.854(95%ci:0.814 至 0.894)。在截断分数为 5 时,敏感性低于截断分数为 4 时的敏感性。所有潜在的截断分数都显示出较差的敏感性(<0.90)。

结论

roc 分析显示出较差的辨别力。没有潜在的 dt 截断值具有可接受的敏感性。dt 在 npc 幸存者中表现出较差的敏感性。因此,dt 可能不是长期中国 npc 幸存者心理困扰筛查的有效工具。

相似文献

2
Validation of Malaysian translated distress thermometer with problem checklist among the breast cancer survivors in Malaysia.
Asian J Psychiatr. 2012 Mar;5(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
4
Using Rasch analysis to examine the distress thermometer's cut-off scores among a mixed group of patients with cancer.
Qual Life Res. 2014 Oct;23(8):2257-65. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0673-0. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
5
The distress thermometer in survivors of gynaecological cancer: accuracy in screening and association with the need for person-centred support.
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Apr;26(4):1143-1150. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3935-x. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
6
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Distress Thermometer for Screening Distress in Asian Patients with Cancer.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2021 Jun;28(2):212-220. doi: 10.1007/s10880-020-09705-9.
7
The efficiency of distress thermometer in the determination of supporting needs for cancer inpatients.
Libyan J Med. 2021 Dec;16(1):1957199. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2021.1957199.
9
The Distress Thermometer as an ultra-short screening tool: a first validation study for mixed-cancer outpatients in Singapore.
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 May;55(4):1055-62. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
10
Screening cancer patients' families with the distress thermometer (DT): a validation study.
Psychooncology. 2008 Oct;17(10):959-66. doi: 10.1002/pon.1320.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation and application of the breast cancer distress thermometer in Chinese patients: Cutoff scores and stage-specific manifestations.
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Apr 26;12:100705. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100705. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
The impact of distress at diagnosis in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing pancreatectomy.
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1054. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14365-9.
4
Time estimation is associated with the levels of distress in patients prior to starting radiotherapy.
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jul 1;31:100258. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100258. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Performance of Distress Thermometer and Associated Factors of Psychological Distress among Chinese Cancer Patients.
J Oncol. 2020 Sep 22;2020:3293589. doi: 10.1155/2020/3293589. eCollection 2020.
9
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Distress Thermometer for Screening Distress in Asian Patients with Cancer.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2021 Jun;28(2):212-220. doi: 10.1007/s10880-020-09705-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation and reliability of distress thermometer in chinese cancer patients.
Chin J Cancer Res. 2011 Mar;23(1):54-8. doi: 10.1007/s11670-011-0054-y.
7
Psychological distress in Icelandic patients with repeated recurrences of cancer.
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2010 Dec;16(12):586-92. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2010.16.12.586.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验