Suppr超能文献

数字取证:一种分析性犯罪现场程序模型 (ACSPM)。

Digital forensics: an analytical crime scene procedure model (ACSPM).

机构信息

Gazi University, Faculty of Education, Department of Computer, Education and Instructional Technologies, Turkey.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Dec 10;233(1-3):244-56. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

Abstract

In order to ensure that digital evidence is collected, preserved, examined, or transferred in a manner safeguarding the accuracy and reliability of the evidence, law enforcement and digital forensic units must establish and maintain an effective quality assurance system. The very first part of this system is standard operating procedures (SOP's) and/or models, conforming chain of custody requirements, those rely on digital forensics "process-phase-procedure-task-subtask" sequence. An acceptable and thorough Digital Forensics (DF) process depends on the sequential DF phases, and each phase depends on sequential DF procedures, respectively each procedure depends on tasks and subtasks. There are numerous amounts of DF Process Models that define DF phases in the literature, but no DF model that defines the phase-based sequential procedures for crime scene identified. An analytical crime scene procedure model (ACSPM) that we suggest in this paper is supposed to fill in this gap. The proposed analytical procedure model for digital investigations at a crime scene is developed and defined for crime scene practitioners; with main focus on crime scene digital forensic procedures, other than that of whole digital investigation process and phases that ends up in a court. When reviewing the relevant literature and interrogating with the law enforcement agencies, only device based charts specific to a particular device and/or more general perspective approaches to digital evidence management models from crime scene to courts are found. After analyzing the needs of law enforcement organizations and realizing the absence of crime scene digital investigation procedure model for crime scene activities we decided to inspect the relevant literature in an analytical way. The outcome of this inspection is our suggested model explained here, which is supposed to provide guidance for thorough and secure implementation of digital forensic procedures at a crime scene. In digital forensic investigations each case is unique and needs special examination, it is not possible to cover every aspect of crime scene digital forensics, but the proposed procedure model is supposed to be a general guideline for practitioners.

摘要

为了确保数字证据以确保证据准确性和可靠性的方式进行收集、保存、检查或转移,执法和数字取证部门必须建立和维护有效的质量保证体系。该系统的第一个部分是符合监管链要求的标准操作程序 (SOP) 和/或模型,这些模型依赖于数字取证的“过程-阶段-程序-任务-子任务”序列。一个可接受且彻底的数字取证 (DF) 过程取决于连续的 DF 阶段,每个阶段分别取决于连续的 DF 程序,每个程序分别取决于任务和子任务。文献中有许多定义 DF 阶段的 DF 过程模型,但没有定义犯罪现场识别的基于阶段的顺序过程的 DF 模型。本文中我们建议的一种分析犯罪现场程序模型 (ACSPM) 旨在填补这一空白。本文提出的用于犯罪现场数字调查的分析程序模型是为犯罪现场从业人员开发和定义的;主要侧重于犯罪现场数字取证程序,而不是整个数字调查过程和最终提交法庭的阶段。在审查相关文献并与执法机构进行询问时,仅发现了特定于特定设备的基于设备的图表和/或更一般的数字证据管理模型视角方法,从犯罪现场到法庭。在分析执法组织的需求并意识到犯罪现场数字调查程序模型缺乏犯罪现场活动后,我们决定以分析的方式检查相关文献。检查的结果是我们在这里解释的建议模型,该模型旨在为在犯罪现场彻底和安全地实施数字取证程序提供指导。在数字取证调查中,每个案件都是独特的,需要特殊检查,不可能涵盖犯罪现场数字取证的各个方面,但建议的程序模型应该是从业人员的一般指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验