Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5723, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5723, USA; Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Centers, Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2014 Feb;155:283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.054. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
To assess mood stabilizer (MS) and second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) prescribing trends in bipolar disorder (BD) outpatients referred to a bipolar disorder specialty clinic over the past 12 years.
BD outpatients referred to the Stanford University Bipolar Disorder Clinic during 2000-2011 were assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation. Prescription rates for MSs and SGAs were compared during the first (2000-2005) and second (2006-2011) six years.
Among 597 BD patients (mean±SD age 35.4±8.6 years; 58.1% female; 40.7% Type I, 43.6% Type II, and 15.7% Type Not Otherwise Specified; taking 2.6±1.7 prescription psychotropic medications), lamotrigine, quetiapine, and aripiprazole usage more than doubled, from 14.7% to 37.2% (p<0.0001), 7.2% to 19.7% (p<0.0001), and 3.1% to 10.9% (p=0.0003), respectively, while olanzapine and risperidone use decreased by more than half from 15.0% to 6.6% (p=0.0043), and from 8.7% to 3.8% (p=0.039), respectively. SGA use increased from 34.1% to 44.8% (p=0.013), although MS use continued to be more common (in 65.2% for 2006-2011). Use of other individual MSs and SGAs and MSs as a class did not change significantly.
Over 12 years, in patients referred to a BD specialty clinic, lamotrigine, quetiapine, and aripiprazole use more than doubled, and olanzapine and risperidone use decreased by more than half. Tolerability (for lamotrigine, aripiprazole, olanzapine, and risperidone) more than efficacy (for quetiapine) differences may have driven these findings. Additional studies are needed to explore the relative influences of enhanced tolerability versus efficacy upon prescribing practices in BD patients.
评估过去 12 年中在斯坦福大学双相情感障碍专科诊所就诊的双相情感障碍(BD)门诊患者中情绪稳定剂(MS)和第二代抗精神病药物(SGA)的使用趋势。
在 2000 年至 2011 年期间,采用斯坦福大学双相情感障碍专科诊所的 STEP-BD 情感障碍评估对 597 例 BD 患者进行评估。比较前六年(2000-2005 年)和后六年(2006-2011 年)MS 和 SGA 的处方率。
在 597 例 BD 患者中(平均年龄 35.4±8.6 岁;58.1%为女性;40.7%为 I 型,43.6%为 II 型,15.7%为未特指型;服用 2.6±1.7 种处方精神药物),拉莫三嗪、喹硫平、阿立哌唑的使用率翻了一番多,分别从 14.7%增至 37.2%(p<0.0001)、从 7.2%增至 19.7%(p<0.0001)和从 3.1%增至 10.9%(p=0.0003),而奥氮平和利培酮的使用率则分别下降了一半以上,从 15.0%降至 6.6%(p=0.0043)和从 8.7%降至 3.8%(p=0.039)。SGA 的使用率从 34.1%增至 44.8%(p=0.013),尽管 MS 的使用率仍然更高(2006-2011 年为 65.2%)。其他单一 MS 和 SGA 的使用以及 MS 类药物的使用并未显著变化。
在过去 12 年中,在被转诊至 BD 专科诊所的患者中,拉莫三嗪、喹硫平、阿立哌唑的使用率增加了一倍多,奥氮平和利培酮的使用率下降了一半以上。这些发现可能与耐受性(对于拉莫三嗪、阿立哌唑、奥氮平和利培酮)优于疗效(对于喹硫平)的差异有关。需要进一步的研究来探讨增强的耐受性与疗效对 BD 患者处方实践的相对影响。