Suppr超能文献

尸体肾移植等待名单上患者的身体成分分析:血液透析和腹膜透析患者的比较

Body composition analysis of patients on waiting list for cadaveric renal transplantation: a comparison of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients.

作者信息

Bal Z, Uyar M E, Tutal E, Guliyev O, Sezer S, Haberal M

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2013;45(10):3489-93. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.08.097.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bioelectrical impedance analysis is a simple, noninvasive method of assessing body composition. Dialysis modality and selection of buffer type may have an impact on body composition. The aim of our study was to compare body compositions of patients from the waiting list for cadaveric renal transplantation according to the dialysis modality.

METHODS

We examined a total of 152 (110 hemodialysis [HD] and 42 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis [CAPD]) patients. Demographic data were collected from patient charts. The last 6 months routine laboratory evaluations including hemoglobin, serum creatinine, intact parathyroid hormone, albumin, C reactive protein, calcium, phosphorus were collected. Body compositions were measured using the Tanita BC-420MA Body Composition Analyzer (Tanita, Tokyo, Japan). We made a subanalysis of the CAPD group according to buffer choices as follows: lactate-buffered (n = 16) and bicarbonate/lactate-buffered (n = 26) solution users.

RESULTS

The body weight (P = .022), body mass index (BMI; 25.8 ± 4.7 vs 23.4 ± 4.9 kg/m(2), P = .009), muscle mass (P = .01), fat-free mass (P = .013), and visceral fat ratio (9.5 ± 5.4 vs 7.3 ± 4.1 %, P = .022) were significantly higher in the CAPD group. Total body water of CAPD patients were also higher (P = .003), but total body water ratios of HD and CAPD groups were similar. Fat and fat-free mass ratios of patient groups were also similar. Comparing CAPD subgroups we observed that patients using bicarbonate/lactate-buffered solutions had higher body weights (P = .038), BMI (27.1 ± 5 vs 23.7 ± 3.5 kg/m(2), P = .018) values, and visceral fat ratios (8.0 ± 5.2 vs 4.6 ± 2.5 %, P = .023). These patients also tend to have higher fat mass without statistical significance (P = .074). Fat, muscle, and fat-free mass total body water ratios of peritoneal dialysis subgroups were similar.

CONCLUSION

We believe that body composition analysis should be used as a complementary method for assessing nutritional status of PD and CAPD patients as body weight or BMI measurements do not reflect fat, muscle masses, and visceral fat ratios in these patients. Stable, well nourished CAPD patients should be closely observed and be encouraged to increase daily exercise and/or decrease calorie intake from other sources to decrease risks associated with abdominal obesity.

摘要

背景

生物电阻抗分析是一种评估身体成分的简单、非侵入性方法。透析方式和缓冲液类型的选择可能会对身体成分产生影响。我们研究的目的是根据透析方式比较尸体肾移植等待名单上患者的身体成分。

方法

我们共检查了152例患者(110例血液透析[HD]和42例持续性非卧床腹膜透析[CAPD])。从患者病历中收集人口统计学数据。收集过去6个月的常规实验室评估结果,包括血红蛋白、血清肌酐、完整甲状旁腺激素、白蛋白、C反应蛋白、钙、磷。使用Tanita BC - 420MA身体成分分析仪(日本东京Tanita公司)测量身体成分。我们根据缓冲液选择对CAPD组进行了亚分析,如下:使用乳酸缓冲液的患者(n = 16)和使用碳酸氢盐/乳酸缓冲液的患者(n = 26)。

结果

CAPD组的体重(P = .022)、体重指数(BMI;25.8 ± 4.7 vs 23.4 ± 4.9 kg/m²,P = .009)、肌肉量(P = .01)、去脂体重(P = .013)和内脏脂肪比率(9.5 ± 5.4 vs 7.3 ± 4.1%,P = .022)显著更高。CAPD患者的总体水含量也更高(P = .003),但HD组和CAPD组的总体水比率相似。患者组的脂肪和去脂体重比率也相似。比较CAPD亚组时,我们观察到使用碳酸氢盐/乳酸缓冲液的患者体重(P = .038)、BMI(27.1 ± 5 vs 23.7 ± 3.5 kg/m²,P = .018)值和内脏脂肪比率(8.0 ± 5.2 vs 4.6 ± 2.5%,P = .023)更高。这些患者的脂肪量也倾向于更高,但无统计学意义(P = .074)。腹膜透析亚组的脂肪、肌肉和去脂体重的总体水比率相似。

结论

我们认为,由于体重或BMI测量不能反映这些患者的脂肪、肌肉量和内脏脂肪比率,身体成分分析应作为评估PD和CAPD患者营养状况的补充方法。应密切观察稳定、营养良好的CAPD患者,并鼓励他们增加日常运动量和/或减少其他来源的热量摄入,以降低与腹部肥胖相关的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验