Suppr超能文献

[浅表细菌性皮肤感染的治疗:法国全科医生调查]

[Treatment of superficial bacterial cutaneous infections: a survey among general practitioners in France].

作者信息

Fourtillan E, Tauveron V, Binois R, Lehr-Drylewicz A-M, Machet L

机构信息

Service de dermatologie, hôpital Trousseau, CHU de Tours, avenue de la République, 37170 Chambray-lès-Tours, France.

出版信息

Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2013 Dec;140(12):755-62. doi: 10.1016/j.annder.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Aug 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Superficial bacterial skin infection and superinfection of skin diseases are usually treated by general practitioners using antiseptics or antibiotics. However, acquired resistance to biocidal agents, both systemic and topical, is growing.

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

Our aim was to assess the skill of GPs in clinical situations involving common skin infections.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

On 16 June 2010, we sent a questionnaire to all GPs in a rural region of France (the Cher department) together with a stamped addressed envelope for the reply. The questionnaire contained seven pages of multiple-choice questions and five clinical cases, each one illustrated with a photograph (sty, furuncle, whitlow, colonized chronic wounds and impetigo). Anonymity of responses was guaranteed. Data was analysed using the Clinsight(®) software package.

RESULTS

The response rate was 51% (102 responses). GPs reported little difficulty in treating these patients (median 3, range 1 to 8 on a scale of increasing difficulty from 0 to 10). The main results of the study are firstly the frequency of combination of at least one antiseptic with one antibiotic (46%); secondly, the frequency of combination of two antibiotics (20% of cases); thirdly, the frequent prescription of systemic antibiotics for chronic wounds colonized by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (61%).

DISCUSSION

Our study shows the high frequency of prescriptions for combined therapy to treat superficial skin infections despite the fact that monotherapy with either an antiseptic or an antibiotic would probably suffice. It also shows the unnecessary prescription of antibiotics for colonization of a chronic wound. The study was limited in terms of size and design: it was a questionnaire rather than an analysis of prescriptions actually made in "real life", and the response rate was 51%. In addition, aside from impetigo, for which randomised studies and recommendations were given, the other surface infections (sty, folliculitis, whitlow) tend to be treated more empirically.

CONCLUSION

Dissemination of recommendations regarding the respective role of antiseptics and antibiotics (and their route of administration, topical or systemic) in superficial skin infections would doubtless be useful for prescribers, and more rational use of these agents would help limit bacterial resistance.

摘要

背景

浅表细菌性皮肤感染及皮肤病的二重感染通常由全科医生使用防腐剂或抗生素进行治疗。然而,无论是全身性还是局部性的杀生物剂,获得性耐药性都在增加。

研究目的

我们的目的是评估全科医生在涉及常见皮肤感染的临床情况下的技能。

材料与方法

2010年6月16日,我们向法国一个农村地区(谢尔省)的所有全科医生发送了一份问卷,并附上一个贴好邮票、写好地址的回邮信封。问卷包含七页多项选择题和五个临床病例,每个病例都配有一张照片(麦粒肿、疖、脓性指头炎、慢性伤口定植菌感染和脓疱病)。保证回答的匿名性。使用Clinsight(®)软件包对数据进行分析。

结果

回复率为51%(102份回复)。全科医生报告称治疗这些患者几乎没有困难(中位数为3,在从0到10的难度递增量表上,范围为1至8)。该研究的主要结果首先是至少一种防腐剂与一种抗生素联合使用的频率(46%);其次是两种抗生素联合使用的频率(20%的病例);第三是对铜绿假单胞菌定植的慢性伤口频繁开具全身性抗生素(61%)。

讨论

我们的研究表明,尽管使用防腐剂或抗生素进行单一疗法可能就足够了,但联合疗法治疗浅表皮肤感染的处方频率仍然很高。它还表明对慢性伤口定植菌感染不必要地开具抗生素。该研究在规模和设计方面存在局限性:它是一份问卷,而不是对“实际生活”中实际开具的处方进行分析,且回复率为51%。此外,除了有随机研究和建议的脓疱病外,其他表面感染(麦粒肿、毛囊炎、脓性指头炎)往往更多地是凭经验治疗。

结论

传播关于防腐剂和抗生素(及其给药途径,局部或全身)在浅表皮肤感染中各自作用的建议,无疑会对开处方者有所帮助,更合理地使用这些药物将有助于限制细菌耐药性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验