UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK.
UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK.
Int J Pharm. 2014 Jan 1;459(1-2):19-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.11.052. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
Isothermal calorimetry operated in gas perfusion mode (IGPC) is often used to quantify the amorphous content of pharmaceutical powders. Typically, the calibration line is constructed using the heat of crystallisation as the sample is exposed to high levels of a plasticising vapour. However, since the physical form to which the amorphous fraction crystallises may be dependent on the presence of any crystalline seed, the calibration line is often seen to be non-linear, especially as the amorphous content of the sample approaches 100% w/w. Redesigning the experiment so that the calibration line is constructed with the heat of adsorption is an alternative approach that, because it is not dependent upon crystallisation to a physical form should ameliorate this problem. The two methods are compared for a model compound, salbutamol sulphate, which forms either a hydrate or an anhydrate depending on the amorphous content. The heat of adsorption method was linear between amorphous contents of 0 and 100% w/w and resulted in a detection limit of 0.3% w/w and a quantification limit of 0.92% w/w. The heat of crystallisation method was linear only between amorphous contents of 0 and 80% w/w and resulted in a detection limit of 1.7% w/w and a quantification limit of 5.28% w/w. Thus, the use of heat of adsorption is shown to be a better method for quantifying amorphous contents to better than 1% w/w.
等温量热法在气体灌注模式下(IGPC)常用于量化药物粉末的无定形含量。通常,使用结晶热来构建校准曲线,因为样品会暴露在高水平的塑化蒸气中。然而,由于无定形部分结晶的物理形式可能取决于任何晶种的存在,因此校准曲线通常是非线性的,尤其是当样品的无定形含量接近 100%w/w 时。重新设计实验,使用吸附热来构建校准曲线是一种替代方法,因为它不依赖于结晶到物理形式,应该可以改善这个问题。对于一种模型化合物硫酸沙丁胺醇,比较了两种方法,硫酸沙丁胺醇根据无定形含量形成水合物或无水物。吸附热法在无定形含量为 0 到 100%w/w 之间呈线性,检测限为 0.3%w/w,定量限为 0.92%w/w。结晶热法仅在无定形含量为 0 到 80%w/w 之间呈线性,检测限为 1.7%w/w,定量限为 5.28%w/w。因此,使用吸附热法被证明是一种更好的方法,可以定量分析无定形含量,优于 1%w/w。